[gmx-users] T-coupling of water and ion
zouj01 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
zouj01 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
Sat May 28 13:15:29 CEST 2005
> Jian Zou wrote:
>> I am interested in how to set the T-coupling group.
>>
>> for system containing Protein(or nucleic acid), water, and ions(eg. Na), many
>> people do T-coupling seperately with water and ion, ie. Protein SOL ION.
>>
>> While others put water and ion in one tc_group, ie. Protein SOL_ION.
>>
>> What's the difference between these two tc_grps selections?
>> Do they influence much the simulation results?
>
David wrote:
> Very slightly because when combining the groups you rely on correct
> exchange of heat between solvent and ions, which is not given. You
> shouldn't combine non-polar and polar groups in one (or protein and
> water). You can test it with a short simulation and look at the average
> temperature and the fluctuations of each group (if you save velocities
> you can still compute the T using g_traj).
Hi, David
Thanks for your commemnt.
The system is pulling 8 ADE in a water box, Na added.
I ran 2 tests for 200ps 400K 3bar PME.
then I use
> g_traj -f md.trr -s b4md.tpr -n index -ot temp.xvg
to output temperature information for several groups defined in my index.
while the results seem a little strange to me.
Test 1
tc_group = RNA SOL_Na
constraints = none
dt = 1fs
====md.mdp====
include = -I../top
integrator = md
tinit = 0.0
dt = 0.001
nsteps = 200000
comm_mode = None
nstxout = 10000
nstvout = 10000
nstfout = 10000
nstlog = 10000
nstenergy = 1000
nstxtcout = 1000
xtc_grps = RNA
energygrps = RNA SOL_Na
nstlist = 5
ns_type = grid
rlist = 0.9
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb = 0.9
rvdw = 1.4
fourierspacing = 0.1
pme_order = 4
optimize_fft = yes
constraints = none
tcoupl = berendsen
tc-grps = RNA SOL_Na
tau_t = 0.1 0.1
ref_t = 400 400
pcoupl = berendsen
pcoupltype = isotropic
tau_p = 2.0
compressibility = 5.0e-5
ref_p = 3.0
gen_vel = no
====EOF====
====temp.xvg====
####
# System RNA SOL Na SOL_Na
####
0 265 402 263 265 263
10 271 401 268 334 268
20 269 396 266 306 266
30 269 405 266 345 266
40 270 398 267 346 267
50 268 373 266 299 266
60 270 397 267 371 268
70 267 377 265 188 265
80 271 437 268 469 268
90 267 408 265 463 265
100 271 407 268 512 268
110 268 403 266 516 266
120 269 412 266 559 266
130 270 412 267 394 267
140 272 367 269 522 270
150 268 387 265 403 265
160 269 420 266 348 266
170 269 382 267 434 267
180 269 401 266 472 266
190 270 394 267 366 267
200 269 405 266 504 266
====EOF====
Test 2
tc_group = RNA SOL Na
constraints = all-bonds
dt = 2fs
====md.mdp====
include = -I../top
integrator = md
tinit = 0.0
dt = 0.002
nsteps = 100000
comm_mode = None
nstxout = 10000
nstvout = 10000
nstfout = 10000
nstlog = 10000
nstenergy = 1000
nstxtcout = 1000
xtc_grps = RNA
energygrps = RNA SOL Na
nstlist = 5
ns_type = grid
rlist = 0.9
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb = 0.9
rvdw = 1.4
fourierspacing = 0.1
pme_order = 4
optimize_fft = yes
constraints = all-bonds
tcoupl = berendsen
tc-grps = RNA SOL Na
tau_t = 0.1 0.1 0.1
ref_t = 400 400 400
pcoupl = berendsen
pcoupltype = isotropic
tau_p = 2.0
compressibility = 5.0e-5
ref_p = 3.0
gen_vel = no
====EOF====
====temp.xvg====
####
# System RNA SOL Na SOL_Na
####
0 263 247 263 265 263
20 266 257 267 525 267
40 266 244 267 319 267
60 269 265 269 544 270
80 270 263 270 437 270
100 268 244 268 439 268
120 269 268 269 293 269
140 269 230 270 266 270
160 269 259 270 376 270
180 267 257 267 330 267
200 268 248 268 350 268
====EOF====
from these 2 tests, it seems that
1. putting water and Na in one tc_group will give more accurate temperature for
RNA.
2. water or Na could be well coupled to ref_t, for either of these 2 tc_group
selections.
I use different time step and bond option for these 2 tests.
And I use afm pulling options.
I'm not sure whether these mdrun options will also influence the T-coupling.
could someone give some advice or comment on this?
Thank you very much in advance.
Regards,
Jian Zou
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list