[gmx-users] MDRUN errors
Rahul Karyappa
r.karyappa at ncl.res.in
Thu Sep 8 14:04:01 CEST 2005
Dear all,
I created .gro and .top files for my structure with
48 repeat units of polymer surrounded by sodium ions and water. First I
carried out energy minimization by steepest descents and then I ran MD
for 2ps (40 steps). It runs upto 40 steps properly and then it
starts giving errors as follows:
starting mdrun 'Protein'
1000 steps, 2.0 ps.
step 40, remaining runtime: 23
s
Warning: 1-4 interaction between 294 and 297 at distance larger than 1
nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
turn on -debug for more information
step 50, remaining runtime: 18
s
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Back Off! I just backed up step55.pdb to ./#step55.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Back Off! I just backed up step56.pdb to ./#step56.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
...
Back Off! I just backed up step60.pdb to ./#step60.pdb.1#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates
Fatal error: ci = -2147483648 should be in 0 .. 1330 [FILE nsgrid.c, LINE 218]
Also when I ran steepest descents the messages I got were as follows:
Step= 44, Dmax= 1.2e-04 nm, Epot= -1.10077e+05 Fmax= 2.65510e+03, atom= 725
Step= 52, Dmax= 1.1e-06 nm, Epot= -1.10077e+05 Fmax= 3.00823e+03, atom= 8860
Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 1000
Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)
writing lowest energy coordinates.
Back Off! I just backed up steep.trr to ./#steep.trr.1#
Back Off! I just backed up steepout.gro to ./#steepout.gro.1#
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 53 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
Potential Energy = -1.1007694e+05
Maximum force = 2.6551050e+03 on atom 725
Norm of force = 1.0160128e+05
Where am I going wrong? Please tell me. Thanking you in advance.
Rahul Karyappa
NCL, Pune
*****************************************************************
This email is virus free by TrendMicro Inter Scan Security Suite.
*****************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20050908/81a3ff39/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list