[gmx-users] bilayer area questions WITH DATA
David
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Wed Sep 14 18:38:58 CEST 2005
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 09:12 -0700, Rama Gullapalli wrote:
> Dear Dr Warren
> Thank you for your replies. Here is the data which i
> got for the whole equilibriation process which is
> causing me the confusion.
>
> 1) After 100 picoseconds of equilibriation
> new system size : 6.346 6.414 8.734
> new center : 2.949 2.909 4.294 (nm)
> new box vectors : 5.847 5.762 8.600 (nm)
> new box angles : 90.00 90.00 90.00 (degrees)
> new box volume : 289.74 (nm^3)
>
> 2) After 2 nanoseconds of equilibriation
>
> new system size : 8.032 7.517 8.685
> new center : 2.866 2.906 4.259 (nm)
> new box vectors : 5.736 5.915 8.539 (nm)
> new box angles : 90.00 90.00 90.00 (degrees)
> new box volume : 289.69 (nm^3)
>
> 3) After 10 nanoseconds of equilbriation
>
> new system size : 7.368 8.177 8.785
> new center : 2.881 2.936 4.316 (nm)
> new box vectors : 5.692 5.876 8.640 (nm)
> new box angles : 90.00 90.00 90.00 (degrees)
> new box volume : 288.95 (nm^3)
>
> As you can see, the box size has remained constant,
> but the system size has increased progressively and
> the seems to begin to decrease too.
>
> So my question is do i need to keep equilibriating the
> system till it reaches the original size or is there
> something i can do right at the outset(like specify
> the density in editconf) so that the system does not
> expand.
>
> Also, why do the box vector sizes do not increase?
The volume is constant and the box vectors have stabilized. Plot the box
vectors as a function of time to check equilibration (using g_energy)
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://xray.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list