[gmx-users] Stepsize too small, or no change in energy
Pradip Kumar Biswas
p.biswas at csuohio.edu
Tue Jul 18 16:20:45 CEST 2006
What is your 'emstep' value in your mdp file? Could you try to rerun
your system with a low emstep; say with emstep = 0.00001
On Jul 18, 2006, at 1:13 AM, Srivastava, Dhiraj (UMC-Student) wrote:
> Hi all
> when i am trying to minimize my structure, i am getting
> following error.
> Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
> Converged to machine precision,
> but not to the requested precision Fmax < 1000
> Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
> writing lowest energy coordinates.
> Back Off! I just backed up prodh_em.trr to ./#prodh_em.trr.2#
> Back Off! I just backed up prodh_wb.pdb to ./#prodh_wb.pdb.4#
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 45 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
> Potential Energy = -1.8373166e+06
> Maximum force = 1.5158329e+04 on atom 519
> Norm of force = 3.1759754e+04
> i have tried the conjugated gradient, constraint none and also
> included flexible water but still i am getting the same error.
> what should i do to solve this problem?
> Thanks in advance for help.
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
Pradip K. Biswas, PhD.
Research Associate, Department of Chemistry;
Cleveland State University, Ohio-44115
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 1661 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users