[gmx-users] Fwd: QMMM calculation
Christian Burisch
burisch at bph.rub.de
Sat Jun 17 23:45:58 CEST 2006
Pradip Kumar Biswas wrote:
Hi Pradip,
> Supposing that while coming back to MM from QM you care only for the
> forces on the polar atoms as the MM part is satisfied only with them, it
> is perhaps easily doable.
sounds good! You would need some kind of special hydrogen database for
applying the protons. Perhaps one could use a modified ffgmx2.hdb for
that.
> Alternately, you need to have an admixture as you have said: all-atom QM
> part with united-atom MM part. How difficult it will be to generate
> topology and coordinates for such a case?
Coordinates should be no problem, if one edits GROMACS' hydrogen
database or adds the protons by an external editor like PyMol.
Concerning the topology one would have to generate some "new" all-atom
amino acids (if these are included in the QM box) and ligands. One
could perhaps use the "bare carbon" atom types C and CB for that, but
I don't know if there is a proper hydrogen type.
Another disadvantage would be that you cannot use the great PRODRG
service for automatized topology generation, since this tool "only"
generates united-atom parameters for the GROMOS96 43A1 ff (of course).
But IIRC some half years ago there was an announcement/rumour of
PRODRG being capable of generating OPLS-AA topologies in the near
future. In this case one could switch to this ff completely without
having to generate ligand topologies from scratch.
> What other problem(s) you
> foresee?
Mmmh, personally I would try to avoid a hybrid all-/united-atom ff (I
always try to stay as close as possible to the standard ff
parameters). But since people seem to use e.g. united-atom lipids and
all-atom proteins (OPLS-AA) together without problems this is perhaps
only a fad of mine.
Perhaps Axel Kohlmeyer (who is on this list, too) could comment on the
topic? He's been in the department next door and AFAIK they use a
GROMOS96/CPMD interface over there. Of course I could walk over to the
next building and ask them personally... ;-)
Regards
Christian
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list