[gmx-users] Woodcrest results

[vipin sachdeva]

Yes, they are fine now; I guess it was just confusion.
Thanks for the help.


Regards
vipin




On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David van der Spoel wrote:

> vipin sachdeva wrote:
>> 
>> Considering that you are running 4 MPI processes on 4 cores/2 chips system, 
>> don't you think the  title of the page of the benchmarks is misleading -- 
>> "Single  processor benchmarks" ? Also, won't we get better performance with 
>> running threads. I believe the 2 chips are connected through a front side 
>> bus and  has a globally coherent memory
>> shared among  the 2 chips ?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> vipin
>> 
> Well I can't argue about the title, but the fact that column N means number 
> of cores was mentioned in the table caption.
> Are your results closer to the ones on the website now?
>
> -- 
> David.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,  	75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:	46 18 471 4205		fax: 46 18 511 755
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se	spoel at gromacs.org   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
> or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>