[gmx-users] Energy minimization: problems with ramachanrad score
arloa at mail.fcq.unc.edu.ar
Wed Apr 25 15:10:21 CEST 2007
Perhaps this can help you
Christopher M. Summa and Michael Levitt
Near-native structure refinement using in vacuo energy minimization
PNAS 2007 104: 3177-3182; published online before print as
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 14:46 +0400, dimitry.a.suplatov wrote:
> I'm doing homology modeling. My model after MODELLER has Ramachandran
> Z-score = 0.7 (that is OK). Then Im doing energy minimization with
> steep, emtol=200 KJ/mol*nm. Fmax was converged to 1.82684e+02 in about
> 4000 steps. Backbone RMS compared to MODELLER model is 0.27nm. Z-score
> is -3.5 and that is very poor.
> 1. Could 4000 steps be too much for minimization? May be I should use
> not more than 1000 and do not care about Fmax?
> 2. What minimization protocol do you prefer? What about using different
> alorythms step by step?
> Thank you.
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users