[gmx-users] low CPU load percentages on 16 core box with CentOS4.4

[Mark Abraham]

Makoto Yoneya wrote:

>>> However, the test simulation results looked different (e.g. densities of
> the
>>> system) with lam and mpich2 (I should check more).
>>> How can I solve this situation?
> 
>> It sounds like gromacs+MPICH is working fine...
> 
> Then, MPICH (same as MPICH2?) is safer to use (lam is dangerous) for a new
> hardware?

No, I wouldn't say that unless I knew why MPICH (or MPICH2, I dunno the
difference) was working and lam was not.

I was observing that if you don't have a current problem with
gromacs+MPICH then don't try to fix it without a good reason :-)

Mark