[gmx-users] Re: Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham non-bonded interaction
WU Yanbin
ywu27 at uiuc.edu
Thu Jun 14 20:29:29 CEST 2007
Hi, David,
Then it will be quite slow compared if I used the LJ or Buckingham
function, right?
Yours
Sincerely,
WU Yanbin
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:21:36 +0200
> From: David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se>
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: Warning when using both LJ and Buckingham
> non-bonded interaction
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> Message-ID: <4670DE70.5060400 at xray.bmc.uu.se>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> WU Yanbin wrote:
> > Hi, Everybody,
> > And I found that if this simulation is on gromacs3.3, the warning
> > becomes error.
> > Yours
> > Sincerely,
> >
>
> indeed, since this is not implemented. you canhowever use table
> potentials that differe between interaction pairs.
>
> --
> David.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>
> End of gmx-users Digest, Vol 38, Issue 32
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20070614/7ff8e748/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list