[gmx-users] potential energy =nan

Sheyore Omovie omovie_johnnie at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 20 19:17:51 CEST 2007


Hi,
I figured it might be neccessary to show my *.top file  and coordinate file 
(b4 solvation) so I could easily get help.
Rgds
John

;	File 'twopoly.top' was generated
;	By user: sjomovie (1028)
;	On host: bmp041.biophysics.net
;	At date: Tue Jun 19 23:12:16 2007
;
;	This is your topology file
;	Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane
;
; Include forcefield parameters
#include "ffG43a1.itp"

; Include chain topologies
#include "twopoly_B.itp"
#include "twopoly_A.itp"

; Include water topology
#include "spc.itp"

#ifdef POSRES_WATER
; Position restraint for each water oxygen
[ position_restraints ]
;  i funct       fcx        fcy        fcz
   1    1       1000       1000       1000
#endif

; Include generic topology for ions
#include "ions.itp"

[ system ]
; Name
Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane in water

[ molecules ]
; Compound        #mols
Protein_B           1
Protein_A           1
SOL             314583

TITLE     Great Red Oystrich Makes All Chemists Sane
REMARK    THIS IS A SIMULATION BOX
CRYST1   10.266    5.723    2.981  90.00  90.00  90.00 P 1           1
MODEL        1

ATOM	1	N	ALA	B	1	-0.677	-1.23	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	2	H1	ALA	B	1	-1.667	-1.089	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	3	H2	ALA	B	1	-0.414	-1.744	-1.307	1	0
ATOM	4	H3	ALA	B	1	-0.414	-1.744	0.325	1	0
ATOM	5	CA	ALA	B	1	-0.001	0.064	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	6	CB	ALA	B	1	-0.509	0.856	0.727	1	0
ATOM	7	C	ALA	B	1	1.499	-0.11	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	8	O	ALA	B	1	2.065	-0.922	0.251	1	0
ATOM	9	N	GLY	B	2	2.311	0.711	-1.4	1	0
ATOM	10	H	GLY	B	2	1.979	1.399	-2.045	1	0
ATOM	11	CA	GLY	B	2	3.7	0.321	-1.173	1	0
ATOM	12	C	GLY	B	2	4.606	1.528	-1.169	1	0
ATOM	13	O	GLY	B	2	4.515	2.418	-2.019	1	0
ATOM	14	N	ALA	B	3	5.629	1.648	-0.12	1	0
ATOM	15	H	ALA	B	3	5.805	1.002	0.622	1	0
ATOM	16	CA	ALA	B	3	6.336	2.899	-0.378	1	0
ATOM	17	CB	ALA	B	3	5.719	3.979	0.528	1	0
ATOM	18	C	ALA	B	3	7.821	2.735	-0.164	1	0
ATOM	19	O1	ALA	B	3	8.258	1.505	0.219	1	0
ATOM	20	O2	ALA	B	3	8.599	3.831	-0.372	1	0
ATOM	21	N	ALA	A	4	-0.677	-1.23	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	22	H1	ALA	A	4	-1.667	-1.089	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	23	H2	ALA	A	4	-0.414	-1.744	-1.307	1	0
ATOM	24	H3	ALA	A	4	-0.414	-1.744	0.325	1	0
ATOM	25	CA	ALA	A	4	-0.001	0.064	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	26	CB	ALA	A	4	-0.509	0.856	0.727	1	0
ATOM	27	C	ALA	A	4	1.499	-0.11	-0.491	1	0
ATOM	28	O	ALA	A	4	2.065	-0.922	0.251	1	0
ATOM	29	N	ALA	A	5	2.311	0.711	-1.4	1	0
ATOM	30	H	ALA	A	5	1.979	1.399	-2.045	1	0
ATOM	31	CA	ALA	A	5	3.7	0.321	-1.173	1	0
ATOM	32	CB	ALA	A	5	4.079	-0.705	-2.254	1	0
ATOM	33	C	ALA	A	5	4.606	1.529	-1.169	1	0
ATOM	34	O	ALA	A	5	4.515	2.421	-2.021	1	0
ATOM	35	N	ALA	A	6	5.629	1.648	-0.119	1	0
ATOM	36	H	ALA	A	6	5.806	1.001	0.623	1	0
ATOM	37	CA	ALA	A	6	6.335	2.9	-0.377	1	0
ATOM	38	CB	ALA	A	6	5.718	3.979	0.529	1	0
ATOM	39	C	ALA	A	6	7.821	2.736	-0.163	1	0
ATOM	40	O1	ALA	A	6	8.258	1.506	0.219	1	0
ATOM	41	O2	ALA	A	6	8.599	3.832	-0.37	1	0
TER
ENDMDL




>From: "Sheyore Omovie" <omovie_johnnie at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>Subject: Re: [gmx-users] potential energy =nan
>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:44:32 -0500
>
>Hi Mark,
>I'm sorry, I assume you'll understand that I've carried out all the steps 
>before an EM run.
>David said is because the coordinates are on top of each other, I'll 
>appreciate any more specific advice on how to fix this.
>Meanwhile, I'll try Martin's advice on making the water flexible.
>Rgds
>John
>
>
>>From: Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
>>Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>>To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>>Subject: Re: [gmx-users] potential energy =nan
>>Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:09:03 +1000
>>
>>Sheyore Omovie wrote:
>>>I am doing an Energy Minimisation run for two polypeptides in a box. I 
>>>get the range checking error, variable ci= .... and the simulation 
>>>crashes. After changing ns_type to simple, the simulation is running, but 
>>>very slowly and the first few steps return Epot=nan.
>>>What could I have done wrong?
>>
>>It's hard to tell from your description, since an energy minimization is 
>>not a simulation... but please try following this general scheme 
>>http://wiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Steps_to_Perform_a_Simulation
>>
>>Mark
>>_______________________________________________
>>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
>>interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!  
>http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us
>
>_______________________________________________
>gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface 
>or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

_________________________________________________________________
Picture this – share your photos and you could win big!  
http://www.GETREALPhotoContest.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us




More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list