[gmx-users] Reg. minimization
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Fri Jun 22 12:37:27 CEST 2007
C.RAMYA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to study a mutant lipase molecule. The complex[molecule +
> spc water box] has shown +6 charge so i have neutralized the system
> using genion. After that i am trying to minimize this.
>
> The mdrun program gets done fine.. but i am having some doubts.
> In the log file i do not get values for each step.. as you can see in step
> 3 and 5 given below [but this is case with many steps..n not in any
> regular pattern] :
>
> " Step Time Lambda
> 3 3.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 4 4.00000 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
> 1.49416e+02 1.23777e+03 7.23143e+01 1.73961e+03 3.47387e+03
> Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> 1.86156e+04 8.90799e+04 -5.95683e+05 -9.39925e+04 -5.75307e+05
> Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 5 5.00000 0.00000
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 6 6.00000 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
> 2.06581e+02 1.18779e+03 7.22623e+01 1.73397e+03 3.45845e+03
> Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> 1.86006e+04 8.90886e+04 -5.95711e+05 -9.39880e+04 -5.75351e+05
> Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
>
> Step Time Lambda
> 7 7.00000 0.00000
>
> Energies (kJ/mol)
> Bond Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14
> 1.95651e+02 1.18846e+03 7.23920e+01 1.73374e+03 3.43895e+03
> Coulomb-14 LJ (SR) Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> 1.85910e+04 8.91156e+04 -5.95729e+05 -9.39764e+04 -5.75369e+05
> Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pressure (bar)
> 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
>
>
> This is a run with 0.5 ps timestep and no. of steps as 1000 using
> steep and PME interactions.[other options are default]
>
> I just wanted to confirm is there any specific reason for this..or is
> it fine??
>
> and the final output is -
>
> "Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
> Converged to machine precision,
> but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10
>
> Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
> You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
> off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 889 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
> Potential Energy = -5.8063038e+05
> Maximum force = 4.5843417e+02 on atom 418
> Norm of force = 1.7805715e+03 "
>
> I have read about similar outputs in some papers... but i am actually
> not clear if it is required to re-minimize with some changes or is it
> fine??
>
> Thanks,
> Ramya.
>
>
http://wiki.gromacs.org
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
--
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list