[gmx-users] Question regarding compatibility of UFF and GROMACS
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Fri Jan 4 17:30:36 CET 2008
Subhashis Biswas wrote:
> I know this issue has been discussed in some form before, but hough may
> be I resurface it again. Is it possible to transfer a UFF forcefield to
> a GROMACS forcefield with help of a script? UFF force-field cannot be
> used in GROMACS as per my understanding, and I renamed the FF types of
> an UFF based small peptide to GROMACS by hand, but I am afraid this will
> take for ever in longer systems.
> Also if someone can highlight upon what is the basic difference in UFF
> type forcefields and GROMACS (parameter or potential function-wise) that
> would be great.
If *you* can specify which potential forms are used in UFF it is
straightforward to determine whether you can use it with GROMACS. As
long as it consists of pair potentials for the nonbondeds, it should
> Thanks so much for your help.
> Subhashis Biswas
> Post-doctoral Research Associate
> Department of Energy, Environment & Chemical Engineering
> Washington University in St Louis
> 1 Brookings Drive, Mail Stop 1180
> St Louis, MO 63130
> biswass at seas.wustl.edu
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use thewww
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users