[gmx-users] N terminus charge groups in ffG53a6
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Wed Jan 16 07:52:19 CET 2008
van Bemmelen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question about the assignment of charge groups at the
> N-terminus when applying the GROMOS 53a6 force field. But this may also
> be relevant to other force fields.
>
> When I run pdb2gmx (gmx 3.3.1) on a protein (lysozyme 1AKI in this
> case), it gives the following N terminus topology:
> ==========
> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass
> 1 NL 1 LYSH N 1 0.129 14.0067
> 2 H 1 LYSH H1 1 0.248 1.008
> 3 H 1 LYSH H2 1 0.248 1.008
> 4 H 1 LYSH H3 1 0.248 1.008
> 5 CH1 1 LYSH CA 2 0.127 13.019
> 6 CH2 1 LYSH CB 2 0 14.027
> [...]
> ==========
> In this way, cg1 has a total charge of +0.873 and cg2 has a total charge
> of +0.127.
>
> Moreover, when I select an NH2 terminus with the -ter option, the
> topology becomes:
> ==========
> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass
> 1 NL 1 LYSH N 1 -0.66 14.0067
> 2 H 1 LYSH H1 1 0.44 1.008
> 3 H 1 LYSH H2 1 0.44 1.008
> 4 CH1 1 LYSH CA 2 -0.22 13.019
> 5 CH2 1 LYSH CB 2 0 14.027
> [...]
> ==========
> Now cg1 has a total charge of +0.22 and cg2 exactly the opposite.
>
> Of course this is only a minor detail. But wouldn't it be better and
> more consistent if the CA atom would be assigned to cg1 instead of cg2,
> in both cases?
>
Good point. Please submit a bugzilla.
--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D.
Molec. Biophys. group, Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205. Fax: +4618511755.
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list