[gmx-users] Parameters
Xavier Periole
X.Periole at rug.nl
Mon Nov 10 09:43:47 CET 2008
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 00:45:19 +0000
"andrea hanna" <al233997 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> I have performed a number of simulations using the ffG43a2 ff in 3.2.1 and
> the following parameters (only a few are given):
>
> ; RUN CONTROL PARAMETERS
> integrator = md
> tinit = 0
> dt = 0.002
> nsteps = 125000
> comm-mode = Linear
> nstcomm = 1
>
> nstlist = 10
> ns-type = Grid
> pbc = xyz
> rlist = 1.0
> domain-decomposition = no
>
> coulombtype = PME
> rcoulomb-switch = 0
> rcoulomb = 1.0
> epsilon-r = 1
> vdw-type = Cut-off
> rvdw-switch = 0
> rvdw = 1.0
>
> I recently noticed from the manual that the nstlist should be 5 with gromos
> 96 ff. I have a couple of questions.
> 1. should this be 5 with a 0.001 timestep or with a 0.002 timestep
> 2. As I have done a lot of work using these parameters I was really looking
> for some suggestions/advice as to whether I can use any of my data - I;m
> really clinging onto hope here! And as to how 'badly' this choice/mistake
> will have affected my work.
The nstlist is one issue but the most worrying is the use of a straight
cutoff at 1.0 nm for the vdW. This should be 1.4 nm and makes a big
difference.
Note also that I am not sure this force field has not been tested for PME and
developed for Reaction-Field. You should check the original paper.
You can rerun some of your jobs with a parameter set closer to the original
and check whether your observable vary significantly or not. That is
probably the best you can do.
XAvier.
>
> Thanks,
> Les
-----------------------------------------------------
XAvier Periole - PhD
- Molecular Dynamics Group -
Computation and NMR
University of Groningen
The Netherlands
-----------------------------------------------------
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list