[gmx-users] Fatal Equilibration Errors

Nagy, Peter I. PNAGY at UTNet.UToledo.Edu
Sun Aug 9 01:46:59 CEST 2009


   It is extremely surprising that you have not found solute-solvent hydrogen bonds in aqueous solution. What is the O-C-C-O conformation? If it is trans, then what do the OH hydrogens do?
If O-C-C-O is gauche, then existence of two internal hydrogen bonds is possible, but it is
far from the quantum mechanically most stable form in the gas phase. I think that at least one solute-solvent hydrogen bond should have been seen. There are papers in the literature which do show solute-solvent hydrogen bonds in water. The exciting question is: there is one
H-O-C-C trans moiety in the gas phase, and the other H is H-bonded to this oxygen, when the O-C-C-O skeleton is gauche. Then the question of solvation is, whether this intramolecular hydrogen bond is maintained or disrupts. In aqueous solution it may, whereas in chloroform or CCl4 both OH may be internally H-bonded. Experiments found 12% O-C-C-O trans and 88% O-C-C-O gauche conformers in aqueous solution. Modeling should find what are the positions of the hydroxy hydrogens.
   If you really do not find solute-solvent hydrogen bonds, your ethylene-glycol charges may be
questionable. What charge values did you use? A possibility is that the glycol OH charges cannot compete with those of the water model (SPC, TIPxP or what) in forming intermolecular hydrogen bonds.

Peter Nagy
The University of Toledo, 
Toledo, OH 43606

-----Original Message-----
From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org on behalf of Nancy
Sent: Sat 8/8/2009 3:33 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: [gmx-users] Fatal Equilibration Errors
 
Hello,

I have successfully minimised and equilibrated ethylene glycol in a water
box.  I have noticed that there seem to be no hydrogen bonds between the
solute and solvent, but there are hydrogen bonds forming and breaking
between solvent molecules.  Is this a normal behavior during minimsation and
equilibration?

I am now trying to run MD on glycerol.  I start with a "glycerol.mol2" file
which contains the structure of glycerol.  I am using the following commands
to setup and run minimisation and equilibration on glycerol:

$ .../topolbuild1_2_1/src/topolbuild -n glycerol -dir
.../topolbuild1_2_1/dat/gromacs -ff gmx53a6

I modified the "defaults" part of the "ffglycerol.itp" (generated by
topolbuild) file to read:

===========================
[ defaults ]
;nbfunc     comb-rule      gen-pairs     fudgeLJ      fudgeQQ
      1             1             no         1.0          1.0
===========================

$ editconf -f glycerol.gro -o glycerol_box.gro -box 2.65 2.65 2.65
$ genbox -cp glycerol_box.gro -cs spc216.gro -o glycerol_solv.gro -p
glycerol.top -box 2.65 2.65 2.65
$ grompp -f em.mdp -c glycerol_solv.gro -p glycerol.top -o em.tpr

my "em.mdp" file is as follows:

===========================
constraints         =  none
integrator          =  steep
nsteps              =  10000

emtol               =  10.0
emstep              =  0.01

nstlist             =  2
coulombtype         =  PME
nstcomm             =  2

ns_type             =  grid
rlist               =  1.0
rcoulomb            =  1.0
rvdw                =  1.3
nstxout             =  2

pbc                 =  xyz
pme_order           =  4
===========================

$ mdrun -v -deffnm em

the last few lines of output are:

===============================================================
Step= 6990, Dmax= 4.7e-04 nm, Epot= -3.34590e+04 Fmax= 9.13695e+01, atom= 4
Step= 6992, Dmax= 2.8e-04 nm, Epot= -3.34590e+04 Fmax= 1.40130e+02, atom= 5
Step= 6993, Dmax= 3.4e-04 nm, Epot= -3.34591e+04 Fmax= 8.57813e+01, atom= 4
Step= 6994, Dmax= 4.0e-04 nm, Epot= -3.34591e+04 Fmax= 2.41887e+02, atom= 5
Step= 6995, Dmax= 4.8e-04 nm, Epot= -3.34592e+04 Fmax= 9.36159e+01, atom= 4
Step= 6999, Dmax= 7.3e-05 nm, Epot= -3.34592e+04 Fmax= 4.95606e+01, atom= 4
Step= 7006, Dmax= 1.4e-06 nm, Epot= -3.34592e+04 Fmax= 4.89221e+01, atom= 4
Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10

Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
off constraints alltogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)

writing lowest energy coordinates.

Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 7007 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
Potential Energy  = -3.3459230e+04
Maximum force     =  4.9560604e+01 on atom 4
Norm of force     =  3.4399371e+00
===============================================================

As I believe these forces to be acceptable, I proceed to equilibration:

$ grompp -f nvt.mdp -c em.gro -p glycerol.top -o nvt.tpr

where my "nvt.mdp" file is:

===========================
title        = Glycerol NVT equilibration
define        = -DPOSRES

integrator    = md
nsteps        = 5000
dt        = 0.002

nstxout        = 10
nstvout        = 10
nstenergy    = 10
nstlog        = 10

continuation    = no
constraint_algorithm = lincs
constraints    = all-angles
lincs_iter    = 1
lincs_order    = 4

ns_type        = grid
nstlist        = 5
rlist        = 1.0
rcoulomb    = 1.0
rvdw        = 1.3

coulombtype    = PME
pme_order    = 4
fourierspacing    = 0.16

tcoupl        = V-rescale
tc-grps        = GOL SOL
tau_t        = 0.1 0.1
ref_t        = 300 300

pcoupl        = no

pbc        = xyz

DispCorr    = EnerPres

gen_vel        = yes
gen_temp    = 300
gen_seed    = -1
===========================

where "GOL" refers to GlycerOL.

$ mdrun -v -deffnm nvt

When I execute the above command, I get numerous errors of the following
type:

===============================================================
Step 0, time 0 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.326337, max 0.500490 (between atoms 1 and 3)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
starting mdrun 'glycerol.pdb in water'
5000 steps,     10.0 ps.

Step 0, time 0 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 0.663850, max 1.227203 (between atoms 1 and 7)
bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
      1      3  172.3    0.2091   0.1644      0.2004
      7      9  164.1    0.2082   0.1625      0.2004
      2      3  124.5    0.1022   0.0787      0.1000
      1      2  148.3    0.1477   0.0882      0.1435
      5      6   30.4    0.0992   0.1265      0.1000
      8      9  134.1    0.1014   0.0660      0.1000
      7      8  138.2    0.1476   0.0991      0.1435

Warning: 1-4 interaction between 2 and 7 at distance 6.002 which is larger
than the 1-4 table size 2.300 nm
These are ignored for the rest of the simulation
This usually means your system is exploding,
if not, you should increase table-extension in your mdp file
or with user tables increase the table size

t = 0.004 ps: Water molecule starting at atom 1234 can not be settled.
Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep.
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates

There were 12 inconsistent shifts. Check your topology
Segmentation fault
===============================================================

I don't know what is happening wrong.  Please advise.

Thank you.

Nancy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090808/f4921710/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list