[gmx-users] About exclusion of non-bonded interaction for pairs of energy groups
Berk Hess
gmx3 at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 10 14:32:41 CEST 2009
> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:11:57 +1000
> From: Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] About exclusion of non-bonded interaction for pairs of energy groups
>
> Berk Hess wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:52:31 +1000
> >> From: Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
> >> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] About exclusion of non-bonded interaction for pairs of energy groups
> >>
> >> Lee Soin wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>> Sorry to bother you again, but I have another question. I have written a
> >>> topology file of two water molecules to test the pair interaction. Here is
> >>> part of my topology file:
> >>>
> >>> [ moleculetype ]
> >>> SOL 2
> >>> [ atoms ]
> >>> 1 opls_116 1 SOL OW 1 -0.82
> >>> 2 opls_117 1 SOL HW1 1 0.41
> >>> 3 opls_117 1 SOL HW2 1 0.41
> >>> 4 opls_116 2 SOL OW 2 -0.82
> >>> 5 opls_117 2 SOL HW1 2 0.41
> >>> 6 opls_117 2 SOL HW2 2 0.41
> >>> [ settles ]
> >>> 1 1 0.1 0.16330
> >>> 4 1 0.1 0.16330
> >>> [ exclusions ]
> >>> 1 2 3
> >>> 2 1 3
> >>> 3 1 2
> >>> 4 5 6
> >>> 5 4 6
> >>> 6 4 5
> >>> [ exclusions ]
> >>> 1 4
> >>> [ pairs ]
> >>> 1 4 1
> >>>
> >>> I have also changed the fudgeLJ and fudgeQQ to 1.0.
> >>> Originally, there is no pair interaction in this system. First I did a
> >>> simulation when the last 4 lines were removed, that is, I treated all the
> >>> interactions as non-bonded interactions.
> >> Since there is no bonded interaction between 1 and 4, your second [
> >> exclusions ] directive will not have any effect. Read section 5.4.
> >> Exclusions are cancellations only of interactions between bonded atoms.
> >>
> >
> > That is incorrect.
> > The exclusion line makes Gromacs excluded non-bonded interactions
> > between atoms 1 and 4. The [ exclusions ] section, although itself
> > "bonded" in some ways, has no relation at all with any other bonded
> > interactions.
>
> True, 5.4 does point out that there are (in a sense) two kinds of
> exclusions, viz "The exclusions for bonded particles are generated by
> grompp for neighboring atoms up to a certain number of bonds away, as
> defined in the [ moleculetype ] section in the topology file (see
> 5.7.1).". Then the second paragraph goes on to point out the purpose of
> [ exclusions ]: "Extra exclusions within a molecule can be added
> manually in a [ exclusions ] section."
>
> Perhaps the wording of this description could be improved, since the
> sense of "[ exclusions ]" is actually "[ extra_exclusions ]"? A sentence
> clarifying this before the full explanation would make things clearer:
>
> "Exclusions
>
> Additional pairs of particles from which non-bonded interactions are to
> be excluded may be indicated under this directive. Some exclusions for
> bonded particles may be generated by grompp for neighbouring atoms...
>
> Such extra exclusions within a molecule can be added manually in the [
> exclusions ] list. Each line..."
>
> Mark
>
The phrase "The exclusions for bonded particles" is indeed confusing.
I now replaced it by:
The exclusions for non-bonded interactions are generated by grompp...
I also added a few more words in this section to clarify things.
Berk
> >>> Then I added the last 4 lines
> >>> to specify the normal non-bonded interaction between atom 1 and 4 as pair
> >>> interaction in order to see whether that will affect the result. It turns
> >>> out that the results for the two cases are different. So did I miss
> >>> something, or are pair interactions and non-bonded interactions treated
> >>> differently by GROMACS?
> >> mdrun is only reproducible if you tell it that you want it to be with
> >> "mdrun -reprod". So it is possible that your observation of different
> >> results is not (yet) meaningful.
> >>
> >> However, I believe you've merely added a second identical non-bonded
> >> interaction between 1 and 4, so you will get different results regardless.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> >> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090810/c06bdd91/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list