[Fwd: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields]
iulek at interponta.com.br
iulek at interponta.com.br
Tue Aug 18 18:13:16 CEST 2009
Thanks for your input. Maybe it does not fit exactly what I would
like (should there be what I would like), but it brings me worthy
information to clear my vision on how I might carry this on.
> iulek at interponta.com.br wrote:
>> I see there are many interesting topics going on, maybe due to
>> this I did not receive any answer/suggestion/comment to my question
>> or maybe it is rather naive. Anyway, it would like to listen to the
>> experts if there are no other suggestions to add to what I did below.
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gmx-users] preferred/best force fields
>> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:35:18 -0300
>> From: iulek at interponta.com.br
>> Reply-To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> Dear All,
>> I am new to molecular dynamics, had some tutorials and could run
>> some initial tests successfully in that they finished without errors
>> (now to analyze if results make sense).
>> Now my challenge is to make a molecular dynamics of a homohexamer
>> which binds to a ssDNS and a co-factor, and that loses some of its
>> binding capacities when a mutation is present. I could build an
>> (non-hydrogen) homology model for the system, but I am still facing
>> some problem on conventions for atom names. I could not overcome
>> everything still, though.
>> But in this post I would like to discuss about the best force
>> fields to use in the main problems I should face: a) a protein monomer
>> in water; b) a protein oligomer in water; c) a protein bound to an
>> inhibitor (small organic molecule) in water; d) a protein homohexamer
>> bound to DNA and co-factor in water.
>> I spent the last days gathering some information through the web
>> and the gromacs manual. I could learn a lot, but I feel I still miss
>> some organization of my understanding. It seems to me that specially
>> for case "d" (the very one of the moment) an amber force field port
>> (which best, 99SB?) to gromacs should be the preferred one, right?
>> Anyway, I would like to make the question wider and ask if someone
>> might point me to an article/links/whatever, for the to mature this
>> overview, id est, to a compilation of the preferred (or best) force
>> field for some typical biochemical MD simulations.
> Answering that series of questions might take a new PhD student a
> month or more of reading, and there still won't be much in the way
> of definitive answers! You should start by finding some suitable
> recent review articles, and tracing the articles to which it refers.
> I don't have one to hand, however. Also, you need to find and read
> some work that someone has done on a similar system and see whether
> they came up with plausible simulation results. In principle, I
> understand CHARMM and AMBER forcefields are supposed to be able to
> deal with such systems, but you will need to do your own legwork
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users