[gmx-users] some molecule clashing with another ?
Chih-Ying Lin
chihying2008 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 31 02:23:14 CET 2009
Hi
I print out the energy EM-solvated.edr file here.
Since the average is high, is it caused by the molecule clashing?
I selected potential, kinetic, total energy.
What else energy should I print out to learn the broken simulation system?
Thank you
Lin
Select the terms you want from the following list by
selecting either the name or the number or a combination.
End your selection with an empty line or a zero.
---------------------------------------------------------
1 Bond 2 G96Bond 3 Angle 4 G96Angle
5 Proper-Dih. 6 Improper-Dih. 7 LJ-14 8 Coulomb-14
9 LJ-(SR) 10 Coulomb-(SR) 11 Potential 12 Kinetic-En.
13 Total-Energy 14 Temperature 15 Pressure-(bar) 16 Vir-XX
17 Vir-XY 18 Vir-XZ 19 Vir-YX 20 Vir-YY
21 Vir-YZ 22 Vir-ZX 23 Vir-ZY 24 Vir-ZZ
25 Pres-XX-(bar) 26 Pres-XY-(bar) 27 Pres-XZ-(bar) 28 Pres-YX-(bar)
29 Pres-YY-(bar) 30 Pres-YZ-(bar) 31 Pres-ZX-(bar) 32 Pres-ZY-(bar)
33 Pres-ZZ-(bar) 34 #Surf*SurfTen 35 Mu-X 36 Mu-Y
37 Mu-Z 38 T-rest
11 12 13 0
Back Off! I just backed up 6LYZ-EM-solvated.xvg to
./#6LYZ-EM-solvated.xvg.2#
Last frame read 41 time 65.000
Statistics over 65 steps [ 1.0000 thru 65.0000 ps ], 3 data sets
Energy Average RMSD Fluct. Drift
Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential 8.98118e+08 4.53312e+08 0 -3.03617e+07
-1.97304e+09
Kinetic En. 0 0 0
0 0
Total Energy 8.98118e+08 4.53312e+08 0 -3.03617e+07
-1.97304e+09
gcq#119: "Bring Out the Gimp" (Pulp Fiction)
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
>
> Hi
> The follwing is my .out file.
> From it, can I conclude that some molecule clashing with another ?
>
No, you can conclude that your system is unstable. One possible reason is
atomic clashing, but you cannot say for sure. General advice on your
problem
(which is encountered frequently, and as such, appears thousands of times in
the
list archive) can be found on the Gromacs wiki site:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#LINCS.2fSETTLE.2fSHAKE_warnings
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up
If you want further help, take the advice that I gave you before - look at
the
trajectory, focusing specifically on the problematic atoms (looks like 366
and
367 are having problems first, suggesting that either they, or atoms nearby,
are
unstable). I also asked about the success of your energy minimization, but
you
haven't provided that information. From the output, it seems that your
simulation is crashing immediately, suggesting that EM did not work
properly,
and there *may* be unresolved clashes. You will have to do visual
inspection to
determine if this is the case.
-Justin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20091231/206abf8b/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list