[gmx-users] Re: IN4 molecule type error
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Tue Feb 3 04:33:59 CET 2009
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>> I have added the #include "drg.itp" statement under the title, ;
>> Include forcefield parameters in the .top file. Thr drg.itp is saved
>> in the current directory.
> This is the incorrect order. You've inserted the drg.itp moleculetype
> information before your protein, then called the protein before IN4 in
> the [ molecules ] section. Order is important. Include the
> moleculetypes in the order that they appear in the structure file (.pdb
> or .gro).
Order is important *within the [molecules] directive*. This order must
match the intended coordinate file. I don't believe order of the
[moleculetype] directives is pertinent; chapter 5 doesn't say it is, and
if it were, the names would be redundant. One could test this by
juggling the order of water #include directives in some topology. The
first system that came to hand proved this to be true.
>> Still showing the sanme error as previous.
>> including a part of the top file.Please check this.
>> ; This is your topology file
>> ; TRYPSIN
>> ; Include forcefield parameters
>> #include "ffgmx.itp"
>> #includeÂ "drg.itp"Â
> I don't know if this is just strange behavior from my email client, but
> if you've got these hidden characters within this line of text, it will
> not be interpreted correctly. Make sure you are using a plain text
> editor, like vi or emacs, to edit your topology file.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users