[gmx-users] about the repelling of DNA base pair
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Fri Feb 6 00:55:45 CET 2009
He, Yang wrote:
> Hi all users,
>
> I am dealing with the CG DNA model and I just list the parameters for non-bond potential blow:
People may care *which* CG model you are using...
> A T 1 0.0069 0.000004109
>
> P P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> S S 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> A A 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
>
> T T 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
> C G 1 0.0097 0.000005422
> C C 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
> G G 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
>
> A S 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> A P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
> A C 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
> A G 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
>
> T S 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> T P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
> T C 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
> T G 1 0.000002177 1.0894852E-12
> C S 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
> C P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
> G S 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
> G P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> S P 1 0.000004352 4.352E-12
>
> You can see that the base pair potential is larger than the other pairs . But I found when I run this case,using the command "ngmx", it always shows that the matching base pair will repel from each other even I set the temperature by 0K in the mdp.file . I have checked the base pairs' distance and originally they are all in the equilibrium distance.
The vdW interactions are only a small part of the story. The
electrostatics treatment and your equilibration regime are also very
important.
Mark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list