[gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal

Justin A. Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Feb 12 20:03:53 CET 2009



Berk Hess wrote:
> 
> 
>  > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:49:33 +0100
>  > From: cseifert at bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
>  > To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
>  >
>  > Thanks for your ideas!
>  >
>  > I will discuss the possible solutions with my supervisor.
>  >
>  > To your PS:
>  > This is a good hint, I changed many optimization flags to get a good
>  > scaling but never changed the axis. I created the box with editconf
>  > -princ. It automatically made z the longest axis and x the shortest.
>  > Since many users use PME, it might be a good idea to change the behavior
>  > of editconf -princ.
>  >
> 
> Ah, I didn't know this.
> I changed the order of -princ for 4.0.4.
> 

Could the -princ option be made interactive, such that the user could choose the 
axis?  I use -princ to orient the long axis of my membrane proteins along the 
z-axis, since the bilayer is in the x-y plane.  I suppose a bit of rotation 
could fix this, but allowing the user to choose would be pretty convenient.

-Justin

> Berk
>  
>  > Again: Thank you very much for your help!
>  > Christian.
>  >
>  > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:28 +0100, Berk Hess wrote:
>  > > Hi,
>  > >
>  > > Another crude solution is to divide your protein into two groups along
>  > > the long axis
>  > > and use the pull code to keep the two components perpendicular to the
>  > > axis
>  > > of the vector between the COMs at zero.
>  > >
>  > > PS: if you have PME your system will run faster when you make x the
>  > > long axis.
>  > >
>  > > Berk
>  > >
>  > > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:21:29 +0100
>  > > > From: cseifert at bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
>  > > > To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > > Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
>  > > >
>  > > > Hi Berk,
>  > > >
>  > > > the rhombic dodecahedron with 1771 nm^3 is still twice as big as my
>  > > > stretched box.
>  > > >
>  > > > This System scales quite well till 256 CPUs and I normally use this
>  > > > amount of CPUs (I have to hurry up with my PhD thesis), so particle
>  > > > decomposition is not an alternative.
>  > > >
>  > > > Are there other alternatives?
>  > > >
>  > > > Thanks so far!
>  > > > Christian
>  > > >
>  > > > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 16:09 +0100, Berk Hess wrote:
>  > > > > Hi,
>  > > > >
>  > > > > The cleanest solution is using a rhombic dodecahedron:
>  > > > > volume 13.58^3/sqrt(2) = 1771 nm^3
>  > > > > (I don't know why people still consider truncated octahedrons).
>  > > > >
>  > > > > You can try using comm-mode=angular with as comm group only the
>  > > > > protein.
>  > > > > This should not produce significant artifacts when your protein is
>  > > > > large.
>  > > > > However, this will not run with domain decomposition,
>  > > > > only with particle decomposition (mdrun -pd), which scales worse,
>  > > > > but probably not so bad with 4-8 cores.
>  > > > >
>  > > > > Berk
>  > > > >
>  > > > > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:00:30 +0100
>  > > > > > From: cseifert at bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
>  > > > > > To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > > > > Subject: [gmx-users] Physical problems of comm removal
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > Hi users!
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > I simulate a stretched protein in TIP4P water in a cubic box
>  > > > > > (6.83x9.60x13.58=890) with pbc. During a 50 ns simulation, my
>  > > > > protein
>  > > > > > must not rotate (otherwise, it will interact with itself). I
>  > > found
>  > > > > three
>  > > > > > possibilities to avoid a self interaction: (1) a bigger box, (2)
>  > > > > > restraints or (3) comm removal.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > In details:
>  > > > > > (1) bigger box:
>  > > > > > I need at least a diameter of 13.58 nm in every direction to
>  > > avoid a
>  > > > > > self interaction (because of a possible rotation of the
>  > > protein).
>  > > > > For a
>  > > > > > cubic box, this would be (13.58^3 =) 2504 nm^3. For a truncated
>  > > > > > octahedron still 1928 nm^3, which would still be twice the box
>  > > size
>  > > > > I
>  > > > > > use now. This is not suitable for me.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > (2) restraints:
>  > > > > > These are "long-time" runs, where I want to observe domain
>  > > movement,
>  > > > > so
>  > > > > > restraints are not an alternative for my simulation.
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > (3) comm removal:
>  > > > > > To use my stretched box, I have to use COMM-MODE = Angular. This
>  > > > > mode
>  > > > > > provokes artifacts, if I use it only on my protein and is
>  > > therefore
>  > > > > > forbidden since GMX4.0.3. But what happens, if I use it for my
>  > > whole
>  > > > > > system? My protein has a mass of 142800 a.m.u. and the solvent
>  > > has a
>  > > > > > mass of 998100 a.m.u. Let us assume, that the solvent movement
>  > > > > reduces
>  > > > > > itself, because its movement is undirected and the mass of the
>  > > > > protein
>  > > > > > is high enough to fall into account (which might not be true
>  > > > > because:
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > v_{comm_removal}= 1 / (m_{solvent} + m_{protein}) \cdot
>  > > > > > \sum_{i(solvent)}^n{(solvent)} ( m_i \cdot v_i) \cdot
>  > > > > > \sum_{j(protein)}^o{(protein)} ( m_j \cdot v_j)
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > with \sum v_i=0 (because the movement of the solvent is
>  > > undirected)
>  > > > > the
>  > > > > > equation would be:
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > v_{comm_removal}= 1 / (m_{solvent} + m_{protein}) \cdot
>  > > > > > \sum_{j(protein)}^o{(protein)} ( m_j \cdot v_j)
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > which weights the movement of the protein with its mass, put
>  > > divides
>  > > > > it
>  > > > > > by the mass of protein+mass, what may result in a to small
>  > > removal
>  > > > > of
>  > > > > > the comm.)
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > Beside this problem, do I have to expect that there might be
>  > > other
>  > > > > > problems with COMM-MODE = Angular, COMM-GRPS = System and a
>  > > cubic
>  > > > > box
>  > > > > > with pbc?
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > --
>  > > > > > M. Sc. Christian Seifert
>  > > > > > Department of Biophysics
>  > > > > > University of Bochum
>  > > > > > ND 04/67
>  > > > > > 44780 Bochum
>  > > > > > Germany
>  > > > > > Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
>  > > > > > Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
>  > > > > > E-Mail: cseifert at bph.rub.de
>  > > > > > Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
>  > > > > >
>  > > > > > _______________________________________________
>  > > > > > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  > > > > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
>  > > before
>  > > > > posting!
>  > > > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>  > > > > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>  > > > > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > > >
>  > > ______________________________________________________________________
>  > > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
>  > > > > _______________________________________________
>  > > > > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  > > > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>  > > posting!
>  > > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>  > > > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>  > > > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>  > > > --
>  > > > M. Sc. Christian Seifert
>  > > > Department of Biophysics
>  > > > University of Bochum
>  > > > ND 04/67
>  > > > 44780 Bochum
>  > > > Germany
>  > > > Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
>  > > > Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
>  > > > E-Mail: cseifert at bph.rub.de
>  > > > Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
>  > > >
>  > > > _______________________________________________
>  > > > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  > > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>  > > posting!
>  > > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>  > > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>  > > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > ______________________________________________________________________
>  > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  > > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
> posting!
>  > > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>  > > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>  > > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>  > --
>  > M. Sc. Christian Seifert
>  > Department of Biophysics
>  > University of Bochum
>  > ND 04/67
>  > 44780 Bochum
>  > Germany
>  > Tel: +49 (0)234 32 28363
>  > Fax: +49 (0)234 32 14626
>  > E-Mail: cseifert at bph.rub.de
>  > Web: http://www.bph.rub.de
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>  > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>  > Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before 
> posting!
>  > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>  > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>  > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger 
> <http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

-- 
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Graduate Research Assistant
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list