[gmx-users] Best performace with 0 core for PME calcuation
Nicolas
nsapay at ucalgary.ca
Sat Jan 10 02:37:37 CET 2009
Nicolas a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to do a benchmark with Gromacs 4 on our cluster, but I
> don't completely understand the results I obtain. The system I used is
> a 128 DOPC bilayer hydrated by ~18800 SPC for a total of ~70200 atoms.
> The size of the system is 9.6x9.6x10.1 nm^3. I'm using the following
> parameters:
>
> * nstlist = 10
> * rlist = 1
> * Coulombtype = PME
> * rcoulomb = 1
> * fourier spacing = 0.12
> * vdwtype = Cutoff
> * rvdw = 1
>
> The cluster itself has got 2 procs/node connected by Ethernet 100
> MB/s. I'm using mpiexec to run Gromacs. When I use -npme 2 -ddorder
> interleave, I get:
Little mistake: I used the wrong cluster specifications. There is 4
cores per nodes and they communicate with Infiniband.
> ncore Perf (ns/day) PME (%)
>
> 1 0,00 0
> 2 0,00 0
> 3 0,00 0
> 4 1,35 28
> 5 1,84 31
> 6 2,08 27
> 8 2,09 21
> 10 2,25 17
> 12 2,02 15
> 14 2,20 13
> 16 2,04 11
> 18 2,18 10
> 20 2,29 9
>
> So, above 6-8 cores, the PP nodes are spending too much time waiting
> for the PME nodes and the perf forms a plateau. When I use -npme 0, I
> get:
>
> ncore Perf (ns/day) PME (%)
> 1 0,43 33
> 2 0,92 34
> 3 1,34 35
> 4 1,69 36
> 5 2,17 33
> 6 2,56 32
> 8 3,24 33
> 10 3,84 34
> 12 4,34 35
> 14 5,05 32
> 16 5,47 34
> 18 5,54 37
> 20 6,13 36
>
> I obtain much better performances when there is no PME nodes, while I
> was expecting the opposite. Does someone have an explanation for that?
> Does that means domain decomposition is useless below a certain real
> space cutoff? I'm quite confused.
>
> Thanks,
> Nicolas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nsapay.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 310 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090109/d251eb19/attachment.vcf>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list