[gmx-users] Re: goverrriding problem

Rebeca García Fandiño regafan at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 5 00:38:14 CEST 2009


Thank you very much, Alan.

In this case, I am not using acpypi, since I am using a topology for dopc already published, and it is already converted into Gromacs. So, it´s  manually, as you suppose. I will follow your suggestion and change c and o by c_ and o_.

Best wishes,

Rebeca.
 


From: alanwilter at gmail.com
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:19:30 +0100
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: [gmx-users] Re: goverrriding problem



Yep, contrary to AMBER, GMX is not case sensitive, so C and c are the same and since you declare them twice you get this overriding warning.


However, I did acpypi aware of this (it should add '_' to e.g. c, making 'c_'). Unless you're doing something manually (as it seems). Otherwise it would a pleasure to see this issue closely (can you send me your input prmtop and inpcrd?).


Otherwise do it yourself by making c_ and o_ and the overriding warn will be off.


Cheers,
Alan
 

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:55:52 +0000
From: Rebeca Garc?a Fandi?o <regafan at hotmail.com>
Subject: [gmx-users] overrriding problem
To: <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
Message-ID: <BAY142-W269F0995D7F3B4890E330DB74B0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Hi,
I am doing a simulation combining amber and Gaff force field (for dopc lipids), this is the first part of my topology file:

; UNK_GMX.top created by acpypi on Thu Jun  4 22:06:03 2009

[ defaults ]
; nbfunc        comb-rule       gen-pairs       fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
1               2               yes             0.5     0.8333

[ atomtypes ]
;name   bond_type     mass     charge   ptype   sigma         epsilon       Amb
 CA       CA          0.00000  0.00000   A     3.39967e-01   3.59824e-01 ; 1.91  0.0860
 CT       CT          0.00000  0.00000   A     3.39967e-01   4.57730e-01 ; 1.91  0.1094
 C        C           0.00000  0.00000   A     3.39967e-01   3.59824e-01 ; 1.91  0.0860
 HO       HO          0.00000  0.00000   A     0.00000e+00   0.00000e+00 ; 0.00  0.0000
 O        O           0.00000  0.00000   A     2.95992e-01   8.78640e-01 ; 1.66  0.2100
 OH       OH          0.00000  0.00000   A     3.06647e-01   8.80314e-01 ; 1.72  0.2104
 c3        c3       12.0100    -0.12654     A        3.399676e-01        4.577296e-01 ;     1.91  0.1094
 hc        hc        1.0080     0.02245     A        2.649538e-01        6.568880e-02 ;     1.49  0.0157
 c2        c2       12.0100    -0.15458     A        3.399676e-01        3.598240e-01 ;     1.91  0.0860
 ha        ha        1.0080     0.11146     A        2.599647e-01        6.276000e-02 ;     1.46  0.0150
 c         c        12.0100     0.44800    A        3.399676e-01        3.598240e-01 ;     1.91  0.0860
 o         o       16.0000    -0.47180     A        2.959927e-01        8.786400e-01 ;     1.66  0.2100
 os        os       16.0000    -0.15429     A        3.000018e-01        7.112800e-01 ;     1.68  0.1700
 h1        h1         1.0080     0.16551    A        2.471358e-01        6.568880e-02 ;     1.39  0.0157
 p5        p5          30.9700   1.14364    A        3.741781e-01        8.368000e-01 ;     2.10  0.2000
 n4        n4       14.0100     0.01626     A        3.250004e-01        7.112800e-01 ;     1.82  0.1700
 hx        hx        1.0080     0.08244     A        1.959981e-01        6.568880e-02 ;     1.10  0.0157
 OW        OW          0.00000  0.00000   A     3.16572e-01   6.49775e-01 ; 1.78  0.1553
 HW        HW          0.00000  0.00000   A     0.00000e+00   0.00000e+00 ; 0.00  0.0000
 Na        Na         0.00000  0.00000   A     2.15954e-01   1.47545e+00 ; 1.21  0.3526
 Cl        Cl         0.00000  0.00000   A     4.83045e-01   5.34924e-02 ; 2.71  0.0128

When I try to minimize the system, with grompp -f minimizado.mdp -c final_system.gro -p final_system.top -o minimizado.tpr I find 2 warnings:

WARNING 1 [file final_system.top, line 19]:
 Overriding atomtype c
WARNING 2 [file final_system.top, line 20]:
 Overriding atomtype o

It is like it is not distinguing the capitals for amber and non-capitals for gaff. Does anybody know which can be the cause of these warnings?

Thank you very much,

Rebeca Garcia
University of Oxford

-- 
Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
>>http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~awd28<<

_________________________________________________________________
¿Quieres ver los mejores videos de MSN? Enciende Messenger TV
http://messengertv.msn.com/mkt/es-es/default.htm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090604/7bf919c8/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list