[gmx-users] Energies in simulation
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Mon Jun 8 19:13:07 CEST 2009
Payman Pirzadeh wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge no, but how can I check that?
A. read the original paper: is your topology correct? Are the simulation
parameters the same?
B. post the itp file here and mdp file and specify energy and expected
energy. How about energy units?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
> On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
> Sent: June 8, 2009 11:06 AM
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Energies in simulation
> Payman Pirzadeh wrote:
>> I am using my own water model which I developed its .itp file. When
>> simulation is done after 1ns and energy is kinetic and potential
>> energies are analyzed, the kinetic value is almost OK, but the potential
>> energy is almost half of the value reported in literature and another MD
>> code that I am currently using. I double-checked the parameters I gave
>> in the .itp with TIP4P and TIP5P to make sure everything is correct in
>> format and unit. But I can not figure out the problem. Any ideas?
> Is there any self-energy involved (i.e. a monomer energy that yo have to
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
David van der Spoel, PhD, Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://folding.bmc.uu.se
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users