[gmx-users] problem in ngmx
Ms. Aswathy S
aswathys at amritapuri.amrita.edu
Tue Jun 16 13:46:04 CEST 2009
My point was I have set the NVT equilibration as 10 ps. But it run only 5.4 ps. when I checked the temperature It was also stabilized at 5.4 ps. That is why I went ahead with NPT.Can we consider OK, if the equilibration stops before the time we set??
I am following some literatures, from that i thought first I should equlibrate the water then give restraint to water and equilibrate the protein further. thats why I did in that way???I will check that once again.
Dept. Biotechnology
Ext. 3108
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu>
To: "Gromacs Users' List" <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 5:03:26 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
> sorry..forgot to attach the file...
>
> After my NVT I have checked the PE of the system..It was stabilised..So I
> thought everything was fine till NVT. How can i check whetehr its a problem
> with NVT?Is that the box type could be the resaon?
>
>
Convergence of PE is a good indicator that energy minimization is complete. The
purpose of NVT is to stabilize the temperature of the system. My main problem
with what you said before was that you did 10 ps of NVT in 2600 steps. This
seems wrong, given the fractional nature of the time step required to do such a
procedure. Use gmxcheck on the .trr or .edr file to see how many frames it
finds; verify that you have a complete trajectory.
Also, in the .mdp file you attached, you are applying position restraints to the
water in your system. If you are not also restraining the protein, it is
probably colliding with the water, causing the explosion you are seeing. Why
are you restraining water during NPT equilibration, or during MD for that matter?
-Justin
> Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu> To:
> "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org> Sent: Tuesday,
> June 16, 2009 4:44:47 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
>
>
>
> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In my NPT step I think there is some poblem. i am getting the follo: error.
>> I have used box as cubic I s that could be the problem???? Please see the
>> md,..mop file
>>
>
> You haven't posted the .mdp file. In any case, see my previous message. I
> think something went wrong during NVT. Here, the messages indicate that your
> box is exploding. See, for example:
>
> http://oldwiki.gromacs.org/index.php/blowing_up
>
> -Justin
>
>> Please try to hepl me.. Box[ 2]={ nan, nan,
>> nan} Can not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first vector
>> parallel to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are supported.
>> Box (3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[
>> 1]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan,
>> nan, nan} Can not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first
>> vector parallel to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are
>> supported. Box (3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan}
>> Box[ 1]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan,
>> nan, nan} Can not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first
>> vector parallel to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are
>> supported. Box (3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan}
>> Box[ 1]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan,
>> nan, nan} Can not fix pbc. Warning: Only triclinic boxes with the first
>> vector parallel to the x-axis and the second vector in the xy-plane are
>> supported. Box (3x3): Box[ 0]={ nan, nan, nan}
>> Box[ 1]={ nan, nan, nan} Box[ 2]={ nan,
>> nan, nan} Can not fix pbc.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------- Program mdrun,
>> VERSION 4.0.4 Source code file: nsgrid.c, line: 348
>>
>> Fatal error: Number of grid cells is zero. Probably the system and box
>> collapsed.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> "Would You Like to Be the Monster Tonight ?" (Captain Beefheart)
>>
>>
>> OIn some pev Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ms. Aswathy S"
>> <aswathys at amritapuri.amrita.edu> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
>> <gmx-users at gromacs.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:40:04 PM GMT +05:30
>> Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in
>> ngmx
>>
>> hi justin,
>>
>> your suggestions were helpful. Actually charges in the ligand topology was
>> having the problem. So I have added the charges from the antechamber. Did
>> Energy minimization. Now did an NVT equilibration of 10 ps. It finished at
>> 2600 steps. But shows reasonable Energy and Temperature (checked in the
>> xmgrace). Seems it works fine..Now started the NPT equilibration.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your support.
>>
>> Aswathy Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu> To:
>> "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org> Sent: Monday,
>> June 15, 2009 4:58:20 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
>>
>>
>>
>> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>>> Hi Justin,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>
>>> Once again i tried to minimize the protein +ligand in vacuum. Also tried
>>> by varying the maximum force constant. But that too converged at the 15
>>> th step (or lesser steps based on the Fmax). The em.mdp file i have
>>> attached here with. Please go through that once please and tell me
>>> because of any of these parameters, the system behaves odd??.
>>>
>> As I said before, it is not the step that matters, it is whether or not the
>> system converges within your criteria. I am assuming EM is working, based
>> on the fact that the process converges differently depending on different
>> target values for Fmax. Your .mdp file looks reasonable.
>>
>> If we can clarify for a moment - several messages ago you claimed that you
>> were doing a 20-ps NVT equilibration that was finishing at 15 steps, but
>> that appears to not be the case. Is it the NVT step that is failing to
>> complete? Is ngmx failing to display the NVT trajectory, and did gmxcheck
>> report problems with the .edr file?
>>
>>> I think you are correct that the itp file created by PRODRG need
>>> corrections. But how can I chek that is that the problem with that file
>>> or how can i rectify?
>>>
>> Parameterization is very difficult. Prepare for a lot of advanced work.
>> Please see here:
>>
>> http://oldwiki.gromacs.org/index.php/Parameterization
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>>> Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu>
>>> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org> Sent:
>>> Sunday, June 14, 2009 10:51:30 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai,
>>> New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>>>> Hi Justin,
>>>>
>>>> I tried maximum to find out the problem but i failed in that.
>>>>
>>>> I will give you the detailed steps..Kindly check once and tell me where
>>>> is the problem. As you suggested now i am trying in gromacs 4.0.4 . 1.
>>>> The ligand topology file is generated in PRODRG beta server using the
>>>> GROMOS 96.1 force field. 2. The protein toplogy file using gromos 96 43
>>>> a1 force field 3. Tried to minimize in vacuum (Please find the em.mdp
>>>> file). But the cycle finished at 15 steps. But in some previous post I
>>>> saw that its not an error so I went ahead with genbox and further
>>>> minimization. But ended in the same 15 th steps. also checked the
>>>> gmxcheck for the files as you suggested it show the following error.
>>>>
>>> What is most important is not the number of steps necessarily, but that
>>> the potential energy converged to an appropriate value and you reached an
>>> Fmax below your target.
>>>
>>> Realize that using a topology straight from PRODRG is often not the best
>>> course. The charges and charge groups assigned by PRODRG often require
>>> manual modification and verification of the parameters. This could be a
>>> source of problem.
>>>
>>> It may be that there is some kind of bug, but before that can be
>>> proposed, you have to demonstrate that the preparation steps were
>>> successful (i.e., EM criteria of potential energy and Fmax).
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>>> '', 33685 atoms Last frame 0 time 1.000
>>>>
>>>> Both files read correctly Checking energy file 1RBP_water_min.edr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- Program
>>>> gmxcheck, VERSION 4.0.4 Source code file: enxio.c, line: 283
>>>>
>>>> Fatal error: Energy file 1RBP_water_min.edr not recognized, maybe
>>>> different CPU? -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> "I Do It All the Time" (Magnapop)
>>>>
>>>> Am I doing any mistake in the steps???? Please find some time to help
>>>> me.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much, Aswathy Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin A. Lemkul" <jalemkul at vt.edu>
>>>> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users at gromacs.org> Sent:
>>>> Saturday, June 13, 2009 6:23:04 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata,
>>>> Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>>>>> Thank you very much for the reply...
>>>>>
>>>>> gmxcheck of my out shows a "segementation fault" in the last part.
>>>>> What could be the problem??
>>>>>
>>>>> this is the last part of the output
>>>>>
>>>>> x[31416] (-7.37978e-03 6.79718e+00 6.07531e+00) - (-7.40000e-03
>>>>> 6.79720e+00 6.07530e+00) x[31428] ( 2.35365e-01 -6.53947e-03
>>>>> 5.65519e+00) - ( 2.35400e-01 -6.50000e-03 5.65520e+00) x[31478] (
>>>>> 1.54478e-02 6.14019e+00 5.74537e+00) - ( 1.54000e-02 6.14020e+00
>>>>> 5.74540e+00) Segmentation fault
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The energy minimisation & the equilibration steps are finished at 15
>>>>> step eventhough it was given for 20 ps(10000 steps).But the output
>>>>> coordinates file doesnt show any abnornmality as i checked in the
>>>>> viewer? My equilibration step was in NVT.
>>>>>
>>>>> whether nothing is happening or any other problem?
>>>>>
>>>> If you got 15 steps when you expected 10000, it seems pretty clear to
>>>> me that something crashed very early on in your simulation.
>>>>
>>>> -Justin
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & regards, Aswathy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Manik Mayur"
>>>>> <manik.mayur at gmail.com> To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
>>>>> <gmx-users at gromacs.org>, jalemkul at vt.edu Sent: Saturday, June 13,
>>>>> 2009 5:34:08 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi
>>>>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in ngmx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Florian Dommert <
>>>>> dommert at icp.uni-stuttgart.de > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> * Justin A. Lemkul < jalemkul at vt.edu > [2009-06-13 07:31:17 -0400]:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ms. Aswathy S wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> after equlibration of my protein and ligand I tried to create the
>>>>> energy file ans well as the to display the trajectories using ngmx
>>>>> option,. But it shows the follo: error,
>>>>>
>>>>> Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Xlib: No protocol
>>>>> specified
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can't connect to X Server. Check your DISPLAY environment variable
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like your X environment is somehow not properly configured.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are working through ssh, then you can :
>>>>>
>>>>> $export DISPLAY=<your current computer's ip>:0.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or you are tunneling through a SSH connection. There are several
>>>>> possiblities:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Try ssh -X to login, this could solve the problem, if you are in
>>>>> principle allowed to use X11 tunneling. 2. In case this does not work
>>>>> either it can be that you are not allowed to tunnel X11.
>>>>>
>>>>> However take care that you also need a properly configured XServer
>>>>> running on your own system not just on the host you login. So in case
>>>>> you use Windows or MacOS make sure this is the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Flo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> also the g_energy command shows that ,
>>>>>
>>>>> Program g_energy_mpi, VERSION 3.3.3 Source code file: enxio.c, line:
>>>>> 239
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fatal error: Energy file eq_2ps_ener.edr not recognized, maybe
>>>>> different CPU?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What does gmxcheck tell you about the file. Perhaps it has been
>>>>> corrupted in some way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, you may want to work with a more current version (4.0.5) to
>>>>> utilize the newest features and bug fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Justin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can any one help me, please???
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Aswathy ASBT Dept. Biotechnology Ext. 3108
>>>>> _______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing
>>>>> list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the
>>>>> archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting! Please
>>>>> don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface
>>>>> or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org . Can't post? Read
>>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ gmx-users mailing list
>>> gmx-users at gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before
>>> posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org. Can't post?
>>> Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
_______________________________________________
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list