[gmx-users] Re: -ighn failing with ffamber

Alan alanwilter at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 12:04:33 CEST 2009


Hi Justin,

Just to let you know that after reinstalling everything again with
Fink it worked fine. I have no idea I hade such a problem.

Alan

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 23:05, Alan<alanwilter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Please, confirm this, you mean that this pdb worked for you with '-ignh'?
>
> Gosh...
>
> So I may not loosing my mind when I said that it was working before.
>
> So, I am running:
> - Mac Osx 10.5.7 intel.
> - Gromacs 4.0.5 (from Fink) with ffamber;
> - Compilers from Fink.
>
> I ran test suite and although I got some fails for complex  and
> kernel, nothing for simple or pdb2gmx.? Anyway, I doubt tested suite
> would fail because oplsaa is working fine here if I do 'pdb2gmx -f
> GGG.pdb -ff oplsaa -ignh'
>
> In any case, many thanks for your attention Justin,
>
> Alan
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 20:01, <gmx-users-request at gromacs.org> wrote:
>> Alan wrote:
>>> Thank you Justin,
>>>
>>> You noticed well that. But this example was built to work without
>>> -ignh and to exemplify my problem, because in real case I have this
>>> protein and either I can use 'sed' to fix it (mainly H names) I found
>>> it annoying sometimes, so why not -ignh?
>>>
>>
>> No idea.  I can successfully process your .pdb file with and without -ignh, and
>> I get the same result (a correct topology) each time.  Have you run the test
>> suite to validate your installation?  Maybe if you post the details of your
>> hardware, compilers, OS, etc. someone can spot something that might be
>> problematic (i.e., a bug).
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 15:51, <gmx-users-request at gromacs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alan wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>> I am trying to understand why when doing:
>>>>>
>>>>> pdb2gmx -f GGG.pdb -ff amber99sb -ignh
>>>>>
>>>>> I am getting:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: atom H is missing in residue GLY 2 in the pdb file
>>>>>          You might need to add atom H to the hydrogen database of residue GLY
>>>>>          in the file ff???.hdb (see the manual)
>>>>>
>>>> I don't know why this is failing, but from the looks of your .pdb file, you have
>>>> all the atoms you need, properly named and everything.  Why do you need -ignh?
>>>>
>>>> -Justin
>>>>
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.0.5
>>>>> Source code file: pdb2top.c, line: 704
>>>>> Fatal error:
>>>>> There were 1 missing atoms in molecule Protein_G, if you want to use
>>>>> this incomplete topology anyhow, use the option -missing
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> in /sw/share/gromacs/top/ffamber99sb.hdb I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> GLY 2
>>>>> 1 1 H N -C CA
>>>>> 2 6 HA CA N C
>>>>>
>>>>> And I see nothing wrong with that.
>>>>>
>>>>> in /sw/share/gromacs/top/ffamber99sb.rtp:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ GLY ]
>>>>>  [ atoms ]
>>>>>      N    amber99_34  -0.41570     1
>>>>>      H    amber99_17   0.27190     2
>>>>>     CA    amber99_11  -0.02520     3
>>>>>    HA1    amber99_19   0.06980     4
>>>>>    HA2    amber99_19   0.06980     5
>>>>>      C    amber99_2    0.59730     6
>>>>>      O    amber99_41  -0.56790     7
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is pretty OK too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Besides, I don't get any error for NGLY or CGLY. Only "atom H is
>>>>> missing in residue GLY 2". If I mess with ffamber99sb.hdb for GLY I
>>>>> got others messages stating the other missing atoms.
>>>>> OPLS, which is very similar, works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> The pdb is as simple as this:
>>>>> ATOM      1  N   NGLYG   1      59.012   0.129  -0.254  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      2  H1  NGLYG   1      58.484   0.488   0.618  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      3  H2  NGLYG   1      58.683   0.775  -1.007  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      4  H3  NGLYG   1      58.789  -0.895  -0.326  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      5  CA  NGLYG   1      60.467   0.239  -0.366  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      6  HA1 NGLYG   1      60.728   1.248  -0.251  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      7  HA2 NGLYG   1      60.773  -0.150  -1.355  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      8  C   NGLYG   1      61.175  -0.584   0.690  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM      9  O   NGLYG   1      60.636  -0.753   1.809  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     10  N   GLY G   2      62.471  -1.163   0.322  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     11  H   GLY G   2      62.882  -1.173  -0.678  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     12  CA  GLY G   2      63.150  -1.717   1.498  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     13  HA1 GLY G   2      62.745  -2.672   1.656  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     14  HA2 GLY G   2      63.047  -1.068   2.389  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     15  C   GLY G   2      64.648  -1.799   1.285  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     16  O   GLY G   2      65.151  -2.016   0.165  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     17  N   CGLYG   3      65.503  -1.595   2.460  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     18  H   CGLYG   3      65.152  -1.325   3.447  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     19  CA  CGLYG   3      66.902  -1.817   2.091  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     20  HA1 CGLYG   3      67.178  -1.043   1.438  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     21  HA2 CGLYG   3      67.022  -2.819   1.632  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     22  C   CGLYG   3      67.808  -1.809   3.299  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     23  OC1 CGLYG   3      67.222  -1.605   4.509  1.00  0.00
>>>>> ATOM     24  OC2 CGLYG   3      69.135  -2.006   3.077  1.00  0.00
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> My memory may fail, but I can swear it was working before...
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks in advance,
>>>>> Alan
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
> Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
> 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
>>>http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~awd28<<
>



-- 
Alan Wilter S. da Silva, D.Sc. - CCPN Research Associate
Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge.
80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
>>http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~awd28<<



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list