[gmx-users] problem in grompp -broken charge
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Thu Jun 18 12:59:53 CEST 2009
Samik Bhattacharya wrote:
> hi,
> Justin, i have completed upto the genion step of that simulation. One
> error is creeping in this step which is nonzero system charge. my system
> is said to have a charge 1.69. now how to neutralize this kind of broken
> charge? another thing is that how this kind of broken chage is being
> developed? i think something was wrong in previous steps. but can't
> recognise which step to account for this anomalous behavior? waiting for
> your valuable suggestions...
Probably you have broken termini. Go and read all of the output from
pdb2gmx carefully. If that doesn't clue you in, look at the [atoms]
section of your .top file. There's a running count of the total
charge... whenever that first becomes non-integral for the last atom in
a residue, you have a broken residue there.
Mark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list