[gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
pdnikhil at yahoo.co.in
Wed Jun 24 11:23:44 CEST 2009
When i subjected the complex to EM, it gave following warning:
"1-4 interaction between 3063 and 3068 at distance 1.436 which is larger than the 1-4 table size 1.000 nm. These are ignored for the rest of the simulation. This usually means your system is exploding,"
These atoms are oxygens of 2 phosphate grps ofATP. Later if i continue, with SD it converges with less precision. so i applied CG. It converged. But when I carry out position-restrained dynamics, it gave # of LINCS warnings in both cases. Does this mean EM is not done properly ? How should I address this ?
From: Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 June, 2009 9:10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] simulation of protein in presence of ATP
nikhil damle wrote:
> OK till here done ! the pdb file generated for EM should have ATP molecule @proper position as input .top file has the ATP.itp included. It did not have. If I do -ci it would randomly replace the solvent. I want ATP @ its proper location. how do i do this ?
Like I implied several emails ago, you should order the [molecules] entries according to the coordinate file, as normal.
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
ICC World Twenty20 England '09 exclusively on YAHOO! CRICKET http://cricket.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users