[gmx-users] Can N(CH2)3 be set a charge group?
gmx3 at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 25 09:31:30 CEST 2009
I don't think that is a good idea.
I put the following advise in grompp
"Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the charge groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.\n"
"For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.\n"
"For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.",'
We should also put this somewhere in the manual.
From: xiaowu759 at hotmail.com
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:28:08 +0800
Subject: [gmx-users] Can N(CH2)3 be set a charge group?
Dear gmx users,
Can N(CH2)3 be set a charge group? Is it too large to set? Any reply would be thanked very much.
See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users