[gmx-users] energy xvg file shows a large energy change from time step 0 to time step 0.2 ps

Pawan Kumar pawan.chinari at gmail.com
Fri May 1 06:26:19 CEST 2009


hi,

It will be better to check the energy after the final production run ....

Pawan

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Halie Shah <haliepshah at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi!
>
> I have just completed a position restrained dynamics run on my protein with
> GROMACS 3.3.3 and I generated an xvg file with the g_energy command...I
> noticed in this that the energy for time step 0 was 0.88 (near 0) kj
> mol/S-1/N while the energy for time step 0.2ps was 1158....after this the
> rest of the time steps (up to 20ps) were roughly around 1150. I'm wondering
> why the energy at the start is so low for my protein (which I energy
> minimized)...I assumed it would be near 1150. Is this a problem/what does it
> mean? Os it fine to move on and do an mdrun?
>
> Thanks so much,
> Halie Shah
> University of Houston
> Briggs Computational Biology Lab
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090501/e6bb71a7/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list