[gmx-users] Constraints specified in .mdp as well as in .top files

Vishwanath Dalvi vishwanathhdalvi at yahoo.co.in
Thu May 14 18:27:12 CEST 2009


Hi!

I have a question about a possible redundancy/conflict in specifying bond-constraints.

I have in my simulation (among other things) a number of bonds - some of which are harmonic while some are rigid (or constrained).

I specify the bonds in the .itp (or ultimately in the .top) files as follows:

[ bonds ]
;  index1  index2    func             deq(nm)       k(kJ/mol/nm2)
       1       2       1        0.1529000000   224262.4000000000
       1      32       1        0.1810000000   185769.6000000000
       2       3       1        0.1529000000   224262.4000000000
       3       4       1        0.1529000000   224262.4000000000
[ constraints ]
;  index1  index2   funct          length(nm)
       1      30       1        0.1090000000
       1      31       1        0.1090000000
       2      28       1        0.1090000000
       2      29       1        0.1090000000

However, it turns out that the .mdp file also requires one to specify constraints in the form of:
constraints      =  all-bonds/h-bonds etc

Do we have to specify constraints in the .mdp file if we already have specified them in the .itp file?

Thanks!

Ashwin



      Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090514/ed1c2626/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list