[gmx-users] Constraints specified in .mdp as well as in .top files
Vishwanath Dalvi
vishwanathhdalvi at yahoo.co.in
Thu May 14 18:27:12 CEST 2009
Hi!
I have a question about a possible redundancy/conflict in specifying bond-constraints.
I have in my simulation (among other things) a number of bonds - some of which are harmonic while some are rigid (or constrained).
I specify the bonds in the .itp (or ultimately in the .top) files as follows:
[ bonds ]
; index1 index2 func deq(nm) k(kJ/mol/nm2)
1 2 1 0.1529000000 224262.4000000000
1 32 1 0.1810000000 185769.6000000000
2 3 1 0.1529000000 224262.4000000000
3 4 1 0.1529000000 224262.4000000000
[ constraints ]
; index1 index2 funct length(nm)
1 30 1 0.1090000000
1 31 1 0.1090000000
2 28 1 0.1090000000
2 29 1 0.1090000000
However, it turns out that the .mdp file also requires one to specify constraints in the form of:
constraints = all-bonds/h-bonds etc
Do we have to specify constraints in the .mdp file if we already have specified them in the .itp file?
Thanks!
Ashwin
Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo! India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20090514/ed1c2626/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list