[gmx-users] 6-31G** for Gromacs
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Thu Nov 19 20:08:11 CET 2009
ilona.baldus at bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
>
>
> Hi Gerrit,
>
> I would like to use 6-31G** for my QMMM-calculation. Since sulfur is
> part of my QM system, I consider that a sensible thing to do.
> Unfortunately, it is not implemented in Gromacs, so I tried to add that
> bit myself.
>
> Here's the point where I got stuck:
> src/mdlib/qm_gaussian.c translates the basis set is converted via
> "ivec" to some number format for gaussian (line 75-84). How did you get
> the numbers in {} and what do they mean?
Follow the usage of the data in that file - search for basisset, and
then the data structure to which the integers get mapped. It seems clear
to me they're being used to create a Gaussian route. The correct values
for other basis sets will be determined by Gaussian, so try its
documentation.
> The other part where I am insecure is include/types/enums.h, line 199-203:
>
> enum {
> eQMbasisSTO3G, eQMbasisSTO3G2, eQMbasis321G,
> eQMbasis321Gp, eQMbasis321dGp, eQMbasis621G,
> eQMbasis631G, eQMbasis631Gp, eQMbasis631dGp,
> eQMbasis6311G, eQMbasisNR
> };
>
> Obviously, names are just listed here, so I think of just adding
> "eQMbasis631Gdp" for 6-31G** which is equal to 6-31G(d,p). Would that
> conflict with eQMbasis631dGp which stands for 6-31+G* ?
Sort of. You can see from the usage of eQMbasisNR here and everywhere
else (grep is your friend) that the lengths of various data structures
must match. This is a recurring GROMACS-ism. If you extend all such by
inserting an entry corresponding to 6-31G** I suspect it will just work.
Mark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list