[gmx-users] Continue simulation
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Nov 25 01:20:43 CET 2009
Jack Shultz wrote:
> Is it ok just to use tpbconv, even though we get this message
> "Continuation should be done by loading a checkpoint file with mdrun -cpi"?
>
Please see the last paragraph in the "Version 4" section here:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Extending_Simulations
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I have tried mdrun using the -cpi flag
> mdrun -v -x -c -o -e -cpo next.cpt -cpi md.cpt -deffnm md
>
> Then when I run the next using the next.cpt, it seems to do the next
> time interval because it is actually taking time to compute timesteps
>
> mdrun -v -x -c -o -e -cpo next2.cpt -cpi next.cpt -deffnm md
>
> using the checkpoint, i get less standard output telling me the
> tototal simulation time
>
> while preping the mdrun using tpbconv -s md.tpr -f md.trr -e md.edr
> -time 2 -o next.tpr
This is the obsolete way to continue a simulation, i.e. version 3.3.3 and
earlier. Follow the instructions in the above link for version 4.
-Justin
>
> I get this output.
>
> starting mdrun 'Protein in water'
> 1500 steps, 3.0 ps (continuing from step 500, 1.0 ps).
> step 500, will finish Wed Nov 25 00:15:43 2009
> step 700, remaining runtime: 258 s
>
> So should there be any difference in the results then?
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list