[gmx-users] Tabulated potentials make newbies crazy
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sun Nov 29 17:10:15 CET 2009
ms wrote:
<snip>
Sorry to say I can't help with the larger problem, but I'd like to comment on this:
> The problem is that since I have a single molecule now, and the single
> molecule must be neutral, so it must be all a single charge group
> ("Therefore we have to keep groups of atoms with total charge 0
> together. These groups are called charge groups.", 4.6.2).
Your interpretation of charge groups is incorrect. A protein is a single
molecule, as well, isn't it? We define numerous charge groups in a protein.
What really matters is that suitably-sized functional groups (generally 3 to 4
atoms) are contained within a charge group, such that the charge group
(typically) carries a net integral charge (-1, 0, +1, etc).
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list