[gmx-users] Problems with GPU-Version and implicit water models
Rossen Apostolov
rossen.apostolov at cbr.su.se
Tue Aug 31 20:54:49 CEST 2010
Hi,
On 08/31/2010 12:53 PM, Christian Mücksch wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am using Gromacs-4.5-beta4 and compiled the GPU-Version. So far only
> Amber-FF are working in the GPU-version.
Gromacs-GPU supports only AMBER and CHARMM forcefields. By default,
pdb2gmx enables the -cmap option, and cmap dihedrals are not supported.
If you want to use CHARMM, then run as:
$ pdb2gmx -f protein.pdb -nocmap.
(If you use AMBER then -nocmap is not needed of course)
OPLS and Gromos use specific combination rules for nonbonded potential
parameters and are not supported.
> When I want to use the GBSA implicit water-model I have to use cut-off
> for the electrostatic interactions due to this error-message:
>
This was a bug and I fixed it for the final release. Thank you for
reporting!
Rossen
> ERROR 1 [file PR.mdp]:
> With GBSA, coulombtype must be equal to Cut-off
>
> Now, my problem is that the GPU-version does not accept cut-off for
> the electrostatic interactions since only options like
> Reaction-Field, Ewald, PME and No-cutoff are supported so I get the
> following error:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Program mdrun-gpu_beta, VERSION 4.5-beta4
> Source code file: ../gromacs-4.5-beta4/src/kernel/openmm_wrapper.cpp,
> line: 1038
>
> Fatal error:
> Internal error: you should not see this message, it means that
> theelectrosatics option check failed. Please report this error!
> For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the
> GROMACS
> website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Will there be an update allowing to use implicit-water with
> reaction-field on the GPU? Will it be possible to use other ff like
> OPLSAA on the GPU?
>
> Kind regards,
> Christian Muecksch
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list