AW: [gmx-users] Implicit Solvent

[Rossen Apostolov]

Hi Hans,

On 01/21/2010 05:54 PM, Hans HEINDL wrote:
> Hola Deisy,
> I have used the implicit solvent which is built into mdrun-openmm. It 
> works well: but there are some setbacks:
> 1. As far as I know it has only been tested with the amber 99 
> forcefield port for mdrun-openmm. (see 
> http://chemistry.csulb.edu/ffamber/ )
OpenMM will be integrated in the next Gromacs release and implicit 
solvent simulations will work with any FF supported by Gromacs.
> and there is no easy way to do a position restraint in mdrun-openmm. I 
> have compared the results of mdrun-openmm using the amber99 ff
> to a simulation suing sander and the results look well at a first glance
> Hans
>
>     -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>     *Von:* gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>     [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]*Im Auftrag von *deisy
>     yurley rodriguez sarmiento
>     *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Jänner 2010 17:12
>     *An:* Gromacs
>     *Betreff:* [gmx-users] Implicit Solvent
>
>     Hi everyone!!!
>     Can I use implicit solvent in a MD simulations on gromacs?
>     How can I do it?
>     Thanks for your help!!!
>
>     Deisy Y. Rodriguez S.
>     Practicante de Computos Avanzados
>     Grupo de Investigacion en Fisicoquimica Teorica y Experimental GIFTEX
>     Tel. 6344000  ext. 2792
>     Universidad Industrial de Santander
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20100121/d53b0d93/attachment.html>