[gmx-users] parallel mdrun (mpimdrun) is slower than non-parallel mdrun?
xiaowu759 at hotmail.com
Fri Jul 30 11:32:47 CEST 2010
Dear gmx users,
I am performing a MD simulation of a polymer film using GROMACS-4.0.7. My computer has a four-core CPU, which enables the parallel implementation. At first, I used mpimdrun to simulate the system, only to find with -v that the vol is too small (about 0.2) and the imb F is too big (over 150%) so about 4 days is required for finishing 4ns MD. However, when I turn to non-parallel mdrun, only half of the time (about 2 days) is required for finishing the same task. Is it reasonable? How to explain it?
Thanks a lot for any replies to this post
Chaofu Wu, Dr.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users