[gmx-users] PMF of ligand transport
Thomas Piggot
t.piggot at soton.ac.uk
Mon May 10 11:35:30 CEST 2010
Hi,
If you defined the reference (r_57) as part of your channel then with
pull_geometry=distance you will have problems as the distance between
pull_group1 and pull_group0 becomes closer to zero and then the distance
becomes positive again.
I recently had this with my umbrella sampling simulations. Search for
the discussion of things you can do to address this issue on the list.
To stop this being a problem in the first place you should have used
pull_geometry=position.
Cheers
Tom
Aswathy wrote:
> Can any one help me please? I looking forward to hear from any of you.
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Aswathy <ammasachu at gmail.com
> <mailto:ammasachu at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ok i will explain you in detail.
>
> Initially i pulled the ligand through the protein channel , using
> the given parameters.
>
> pull = umbrella
> pull_geometry = distance
> pull_dim = N N Y
> pull_start = yes
> pull_nstxout = 10
> pull_nstfout = 10
> pull_ngroups = 1
> pull_group0 = r_57
> pull_group1 = r_C1
> pull_rate1 = 0.01
> pull_k1 = 1500
>
> Then I extracted the frames from the trajectory using the perl
> program provided with tutorial. COM distance I took as nearly 0.12
> nm. (But sometimes I failed to obtain frames exactly at that
> interval, but took nearly at 0.12). Each frame I used for Umbrella
> sampling for 1ns.
> Then I checked histograms for overlapping (Some histograms were
> entirely overlapped and I removed that from the list, where ever
> gaps i selected new frames and did sampling so that I can get an
> evenly distributed histograms , I know this will change the overall
> COM distribution but is there any other way to solve this?) .
>
> Finally once I obtained reasonably good overlapped histograms, I
> plotted PMF using g_wham. The plot was a steeply increasing
> potential. How can we get increased PMF even when the ligand is
> reached out of the channel?
>
>
>
>
> Did I made any mistake any where , I am confused.
>
> Thank you.
> -Aswathy
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Jochen Hub <jochen at xray.bmc.uu.se
> <mailto:jochen at xray.bmc.uu.se>> wrote:
>
> Aswathy wrote:
>
>
> Hi gromacs users,
>
> I am using Gromacs 4.0.4 package. I am doing SMD of a ligand
> transport through a channel.
>
> I performed SMD and did umbrella sampling (Thanks to Justin
> for his tutorial). Extracted frames with a window spacing
> interval of ~0.12nm. and did 1ns sampling. Histograms are
> with reasonabvle overlap. Then I used g_wham for plotting
> PMF considering first 300ps as equilibration.
>
> Isn't SMD usually referred to pulling at some finite pulling
> speed? That would not be umbrella sampling.
>
> Anyway, you'll have to provide a lot more data to enable us to
> help you.
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
>
> I am getting a plot , but potential is increasing
> constantly. ie, PMF is not converged as mentioned the
> tutorial? Do I need to extend the sampling ? or any other
> reason?
>
> Please help me.
> Thank you.
>
> -Aswathy
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Jochen Hub
> Molecular Biophysics group
> Dept. of Cell & Molecular Biology
> Uppsala University. Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden.
> Phone: +46-18-4714451 Fax: +46-18-511755
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search
> before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
>
>
>
>
> --
> Aswathy
>
>
>
>
> --
> Aswathy
>
--
Dr Thomas Piggot
University of Southampton, UK.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list