[gmx-users] building stacks with a desired system density
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu May 13 04:48:02 CEST 2010
Moeed wrote:
> Dear gmx users,
>
> I tried to generate a stack of molecules using
>
> *genconf_d -f Hexane.gro -nbox 4.0 8.0 8.0 -dist 1.1 0.55 0.55 -o
> Hexane-stack.gro*
>
>
> I ran the MD simulation successfully but now I want to change the number
> of molecules so that I get the desired system density. To do so I
> played a bit with -dist and -box options but I find it not easy to reach
> desired density. I need to have nearly 7 molecules per nm^3.
>
>
> Regarding genbox program in the literature I see that it is recommended
> for solvation of a solute in water. (The reason I want to try this is
> because it seems I can directly enter the number of molecules with -nmol
> option)
>
Where is this recommendation? The purpose of genbox is to add solvent. It is
up to the user to decide what that solvent is. For most simulations of
proteins, that solvent is indeed water, but you are by no means required to use
water.
You can add a specified number of molecules with -ci -nmol in tandem, not -nmol
alone.
>
>
> 1-I am sorry for asking ridiculous questions but does it make sense if I
> use genbox and I ask the program solvate a single hexane molecule with
> hexane molecules?
>
> genbox –cp Hexane.gro –cs HExane.gro –p Hexane.top –o solvated.pdb
>
>
> (although this command line is not working I want to know if there is
> any way to modify the command to get it working or my idea is totally
> wrong!)
>
You could do that, in theory. It's useless to say "it's not working" - no one
but you knows what that means. Probably your box size is insufficient.
>
> 2- Initialiy one single hexane molecule is in a box of 3*3*3 nm^3
> (Hexane.gro). What is the best approach for doing such calculations. Can
> I take any arbitrary box size and then based on the box size put a
> specific No. of particles in it so that I get density?
>
You can specify whatever initial conditions you want. The true test of whether
your model is correct is whether or not that density is reproduced after
equilibration under some relevant thermodynamic ensemble. We can impose
whatever artificial starting configurations we want, but they are only useful if
they last through simulation.
Your original approach (using genconf) seems fine. Simulating that system
appropriately may converge to the density you want, within the inherent
limitations of the force field model chosen. Realize that you may never be able
to perfectly reproduce the experimentally-observed density. Even most water
models (that have been around for many years!) have not been able to do this.
-Justin
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
>
> Hexane.gro:
>
>
> **
>
> Glycine aRginine prOline Methionine Alanine Cystine Serine
> 20
> 1HEX C1 1 1.786 1.639 1.501
> 1HEX H11 2 1.881 1.608 1.500
> 1HEX H12 3 1.768 1.696 1.421
> 1HEX H13 4 1.770 1.692 1.584
> 1HEX C2 5 1.693 1.518 1.499
> 1HEX H21 6 1.711 1.461 1.579
> 1HEX H22 7 1.710 1.465 1.416
> 1HEX C3 8 1.547 1.561 1.501
> 1HEX H31 9 1.528 1.617 1.420
> 1HEX H32 10 1.530 1.615 1.584
> 1HEX C4 11 1.454 1.440 1.500
> 1HEX H41 12 1.472 1.384 1.581
> 1HEX H42 13 1.472 1.386 1.418
> 1HEX C5 14 1.307 1.483 1.501
> 1HEX H51 15 1.289 1.539 1.420
> 1HEX H52 16 1.289 1.537 1.583
> 1HEX C6 17 1.214 1.361 1.500
> 1HEX H61 18 1.119 1.392 1.501
> 1HEX H62 19 1.231 1.307 1.418
> 1HEX H63 20 1.232 1.305 1.581
> 3.00000 3.00000 3.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> 0.00000 0.00000
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list