[gmx-users] Gromacs benchmarking results
Mark Abraham
mark.abraham at anu.edu.au
Mon Oct 11 12:20:38 CEST 2010
g_tune_pme in 4.5.2 is your friend here. Otherwise, stay at 48 or below, probably.
Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: vivek sharma <viveksharma.iitb at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, October 11, 2010 21:10
Subject: [gmx-users] Gromacs benchmarking results
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> Hi all,
> I have some gromacs benchmarking results to share.
> I have tried the lysozyme example distributed in the benchmarking
> suite "gmxbench-3.0.tar.gz". I have used the case provided in d.lzm/
> with pme.mdp parameter file.
>
> Following is the performance (in ns/day) I got with gromacs-
> 4.0.5 on
> my cluster with different number of processors. I have tried different
> npme for each run and reporting here the best one.
>
> #processors
> #npme Performance ( ns/day)
>
> 1 2.898
>
> 24 8 44.698
>
> 48 16 75.262
>
> 72 24 86.835
>
> 84 20 102.249
>
> 96 16 97.079
> 120 40 97.738
> 144 64 93.204
> 156 76 89.534
>
> I am looking for some more benchmarks on the same example set, to
> compare these results. Please, share if somebody has tried it.
>
> Expecting some helpful comments and suggestions to improve the
> performance further.
>
> Thanks,
> Vivek Sharma
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20101011/fa82d21c/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list