[gmx-users] Charmm36 in Gromacs: missing dihedrals
Li Jianguo
ljgsq at yahoo.com
Wed Oct 27 17:05:51 CEST 2010
Dear All,
I am trying to use Charmm36 force field in Gromacs. I downloaded the ffcharm36 force field files created by Tom Piggot and Pär Bjelkmar from the user contribution in Gromacs website. Then I used the pdb2gmx to get the popc_c36.top using the following command:
pdb2gmx -f popc.pdb -o popc.gro -p popc_c36.top
When I checked the popc topology file, I found that there are some dihedral terms missing in the topology file. For example, in the popc_c36.top file, atoms 3, 4, 5 are all methyl carbons, there should be three dihedral terms 3 1 2 17; 4 1 2 17 and 5 1 2 17.
Unfortunately, there are only 3 1 2 17, the last two are missing, part of the popc_c36.top are shown below:
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass typeB chargeB massB
; residue 1 POPC rtp POPC q 0.0
1 NTL 1 POPC N 1 -0.6 14.007 ; qtot -0.6
2 CTL2 1 POPC C12 2 -0.1 12.011 ; qtot -0.7
3 CTL5 1 POPC C13 3 -0.35 12.011 ; qtot -1.05
4 CTL5 1 POPC C14 4 -0.35 12.011 ; qtot -1.4
5 CTL5 1 POPC C15 5 -0.35 12.011 ; qtot -1.75
6 HL 1 POPC H12A 6 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -1.5
7 HL 1 POPC H12B 7 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -1.25
8 HL 1 POPC H13A 8 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -1
9 HL 1 POPC H13B 9 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -0.75
10 HL 1 POPC H13C 10 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -0.5
11 HL 1 POPC H14A 11 0.25 1.008 ; qtot -0.25
12 HL 1 POPC H14B 12 0.25 1.008 ; qtot 0
13 HL 1 POPC H14C 13 0.25 1.008 ; qtot 0.25
14 HL 1 POPC H15A 14 0.25 1.008 ; qtot 0.5
15 HL 1 POPC H15B 15 0.25 1.008 ; qtot 0.75
16 HL 1 POPC H15C 16 0.25 1.008 ; qtot 1
17 CTL2 1 POPC C11 17 -0.08 12.011 ; qtot 0.92
18 HAL2 1 POPC H11A 18 0.09 1.008 ; qtot 1.01
19 HAL2 1 POPC H11B 19 0.09 1.008 ; qtot 1.1
.......
[ dihedrals ]
; ai aj ak al funct c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
3 1 2 17 1
2 1 3 8 1
2 1 4 11 1
2 1 5 14 1
1 2 17 23 1
2 17 23 20 1
21 20 23 17 1
........
I also checked the dpc.itp in gromos force field from Tielman's website, which has been widely used by many people. There are also some missing dihedral terms in the dpc.itp file.
I am wondering if those missing dihedrals are neglected intentionally for gromos force field? When I use other force fields such as charmm/amber, do I need to add the missing dihedrals? If so, is there any way to do it instead of manually adding those missing dihedral terms?
Could anybody give some suggestions? Thanks very much!
Cheers,
Jianguo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20101027/fd52eef9/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list