[gmx-users] g_cluster cutoff
Shay Teaching
shay.teaching at gmail.com
Mon Sep 20 01:12:49 CEST 2010
I'm not sure this is necessarily the case. Have you tried other methods
(gromos for example)? What are you getting when using other methods?
Regards,
-Shay
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Kukol, Andreas <a.kukol at herts.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using g_cluster to analyse a trajectory (protein backbone):
>
> g_cluster -f traj.xtc -s topol.tpr -g cluster.log -skip 10 -cutoff 0.5 -fit
> -method linkage
>
> As a result I get almost hundred clusters. The plot of the RMSD against
> time for the same trajectory generated with g_rms shows a maximum RMSD just
> below 0.5 nm. Therefore, with a -cutoff of 0.5 nm, I would expect to find
> that the whole trajectory clusters into ONE cluster. Am I expecting
> something wrong or is there a problem with g_cluster ?
>
> (using Gromacs 4.07)
>
> Many thanks
> Andreas
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20100920/52a8fe25/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list