[gmx-users] Probable error in trjcat; skipping frames
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Apr 26 22:46:38 CEST 2011
Lipi Thukral wrote:
> Dear gmx-users,
>
> I intended to concantanate two trajectories with no similar time frames
> i.e., both files have distinct time frames. But once I combine the files
> many time frames are skipped, details are as follows:
>
> File 1 has 2175 frames
> File 2 has 1232 frames
>
What does gmxcheck tell you about each of these files?
> I used the following command to concatenate:
>
> trjcat -f File1.xtc File2.xtc -o CombinedFile3.xtc
>
> Now I obtained in total 1266 frames instead of 3407 frames as expected.
> When I compared the CombinedFile3 with both File 1 and File 2, I found
> that it has somehow taken the first 34 frames from File 1 and rest of
> the frames belongs to File 2 i.e., the last file.
>
> I am unable to understand why trjcat skips the frames inspite of no
> similarity. I am using 4.5-beta version of Gromacs. I am also open to
> sharing the files, should that be needed.
>
There have been numerous beta versions over the last few years, none of which
should necessarily be considered stable. Which beta are you using exactly?
-Justin
> Any possible explanation as to why I am obtaining the combined
> trajectory with skipping frames, would be really helpful.
>
> Many Thanks,
> Lipi
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list