[gmx-users] Re: Average box size

[Tsjerk Wassenaar]

Hi Navjeet,

These you had in the log file as you showed in your mail. Note that
you use isotropic pressure coupling, so you just need to calculate a
scaling factor, which you can give to editconf to change your system
to match the average box size.

 Cheers,

Tsjerk

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Navjeet Ahalawat <navjeet0211 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tsjerk,
>
> Thanks for reply, Please can you tell me how can I get the average box
> length (a b c) of my triclinic box for my next step.
>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:17:15 +0100
>> From: Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsjerkw at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Average box size
>> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>> Message-ID:
>>        <AANLkTik2TYHLJVmVFC12260RqkdZnUGe-3kOKigFbM3h at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Navjeet,
>>
>> The box is defined as a triangular matrix, so the volume equals the product
>> of the diagonal elements.
>>
>> Hope it helps,
>>
>> Tsjerk
>>
>> On Jan 3, 2011 5:57 PM, "Navjeet Ahalawat" <navjeet0211 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I did NPT simulation for 30 ns using triclinic box (-angles 88.30,
>> 107.40, 112.20) and Isotropic pressure coupling. Now i want to use
>> average box size for production run (NVT). But I am confused because i
>> am not able to get the meaning of the output values of the log file.
>>
>>
>> Log file output.....
>>
>>       <======  ###############  ==>
>>       <====  A V E R A G E S  ====>
>>       <==  ###############  ======>
>>
>>  Energies (kJ/mol)
>>          Bond          Angle    Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell.          LJ-14
>>   9.31715e+02    2.35558e+03    1.63083e+02    5.15266e+03    1.79003e+03
>>    Coulomb-14        LJ (SR)   Coulomb (SR)   Coul. recip.      Potential
>>   1.63211e+04    2.86765e+04   -1.72320e+05   -4.98704e+04   -1.66800e+05
>>   Kinetic En.   Total Energy    Temperature Pressure (bar)  Cons. rmsd ()
>>   1.27874e+04   -1.54012e+05    1.49958e+02    1.07033e+00    0.00000e+00
>>
>>         Box-X          Box-Y          Box-Z         Volume   Density (SI)
>>   4.44479e+00    4.49781e+00    4.88259e+00    9.76118e+01    1.04364e+03
>>
>> If Box-X Box-Y Box-Z represent average value of  a b c then volume
>> does not correspond to my triclinic box because its just
>> multiplication of Box-X Box-Y Box-Z. So Please can anybody help me
>> which volume should I consider for next NVT production run.
>>
>> Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Navjeet Ahalawat
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>



-- 
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.

post-doctoral researcher
Molecular Dynamics Group
* Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
* Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
The Netherlands