[gmx-users] Secondary structure loss in implicit solvent simulations
K. Singhal
k.singhal at uva.nl
Mon Jan 17 14:45:37 CET 2011
Hi
I have a question regarding the implicit solvent implementation in GROMACS 4.5.1 (with GPU acceleration). I have been trying to simulate molecules with varying size (PYP with 125 AAs, BBA5 with ~20 AAs, and and Trigger Factor with 432 AAs), but can't seem to be able to maintain the secondary structure in any of them. Can any one suggest a particular set of parameters than need to be taken care of or used with certain fixed values for better results?
While I have used a varied range of values for almost all parameters, here is the list of parameters recently and unsuccessfully used:
integrator = sd
nsteps = 10000000
init_step = 0
ns_type = Grid
nstlist = 10
ndelta = 2
nstcomm = 10
comm_mode = Linear
delta_t = 0.002
pme_order = 4
ewald_rtol = 1e-05
ewald_geometry = 0
epsilon_surface = 0
optimize_fft = FALSE
ePBC = xyz
bPeriodicMols = FALSE
bContinuation = FALSE
bShakeSOR = FALSE
etc = No
nsttcouple = -1
epc = No
epctype = Isotropic
nstpcouple = -1
tau_p = 1
andersen_seed = 815131
rlist = 1.1
rlistlong = 2.5
rtpi = 0.05
coulombtype = Cut-off
rcoulomb_switch = 0
rcoulomb = 2.5
vdwtype = Cut-off
rvdw_switch = 0
rvdw = 2.5
epsilon_r = 1
epsilon_rf = 1
implicit_solvent = GBSA
gb_algorithm = OBC
gb_epsilon_solvent = 80
nstgbradii = 1
rgbradii = 1.1
gb_saltconc = 0.02
gb_obc_alpha = 1
gb_obc_beta = 0.8
gb_obc_gamma = 4.85
gb_dielectric_offset = 0.009
sa_algorithm = Still
sa_surface_tension = 2.092
shake_tol = 7.5e-06
bd_fric = 0.5
ld_seed = 2010
Thanks and Regards
Kush
--
Kushagra Singhal
Promovendus, Computational Chemistry
Universiteit van Amsterdam
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list