[gmx-users] non-integer charge in a protein setup using pdb2gmx AND slow simulations in vacuum v. 4.5.3
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Jan 20 12:55:52 CET 2011
maria goranovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have figured out the vacuum slow problem. It turns out I was using PBC
> in vacuum with PME. It is now fixed.
>
> The other problem is still there. My protein has 2 chains. one chain is
> simply a glutamate residue. Its charge (both terminii charged is -1.11
> instead of -1). here is the section of the topology with the charges.
> Why does pdb2gmx assign a charge of -1.11 instead of -1 if there is a
> free glutamate molecule with NH3+ and COO- at the terminii ?
>
You're not choosing the termini correctly. Use -ter with pdb2gmx and select the
zwitterion forms of both termini.
-Justin
>
> 1 opls_287 484 GLU N 1 -0.3 14.0067 ;
> qtot -0.3
> 2 opls_290 484 GLU H1 1 0.33 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.03
> 3 opls_290 484 GLU H2 1 0.33 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.36
> 4 opls_290 484 GLU H3 1 0.33 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.69
> 5 opls_283 484 GLU CA 1 0.04 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.73
> 6 opls_140 484 GLU HA 1 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.79
> 7 opls_136 484 GLU CB 2 -0.12 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.67
> 8 opls_140 484 GLU HB1 2 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.73
> 9 opls_140 484 GLU HB2 2 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.79
> 10 opls_274 484 GLU CG 3 -0.22 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.57
> 11 opls_140 484 GLU HG1 3 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.63
> 12 opls_140 484 GLU HG2 3 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.69
> 13 opls_271 484 GLU CD 4 0.7 12.011 ;
> qtot 1.39
> 14 opls_272 484 GLU OE1 4 -0.8 15.9994 ;
> qtot 0.59
> 15 opls_272 484 GLU OE2 4 -0.8 15.9994 ;
> qtot -0.21
> 16 opls_271 484 GLU C 5 0.7 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.49
> 17 opls_272 484 GLU O1 5 -0.8 15.9994 ;
> qtot -0.31
> 18 opls_272 484 GLU O2 5 -0.8 15.9994 ;
> qtot -1.11
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Mark Abraham <mark.abraham at anu.edu.au
> <mailto:mark.abraham at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/20/11, *maria goranovic * <mariagoranovic at gmail.com
> <mailto:mariagoranovic at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I have a protein whose topology I built using pdb2gmx with the -ss
>> option and the opls-aa force field. When I run grompp, the total
>> charge on the protein is reported as 2.9 (not 2.999). Why a
>> non-zero charge? Does this have something to do with the disulfide
>> bridge?
>
> Something is materially wrong, like mangled termini. Have a look at
> the resulting structure.
>
>
>> Secondly, when I run a simulation of the same protein (7000 atoms)
>> with certain restraints in vacuum, the simulation runs very slow.
>> I am wondering why. I am not using particle decomposition. the box
>> size is 50 x 50 x 50 nm. Using 4.5.3
>
> Have a look at the end of the .log file for some performance data.
> How are you assessing "very slow"?
>
> Mark
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
>
> --
> Maria G.
> Technical University of Denmark
> Copenhagen
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list