[gmx-users]Fwd: GROMACS and GBSA implicit water
Bruce D. Ray
brucedray at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 26 22:52:24 CET 2011
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 at 22:06:47 +0100 (CET), "battistia at libero.it"
<battistia at libero.it> wrote:
I am forwarding this to the Gromacs Users' list because that is the
appropriate place for this.
>excuse me if I am writing you directly. I read on gromacs web page your
>advise about the implicit water, and I need to solve a problem for my phD work.
While at my age I could easily have forgotten writing some off hand comment
at some time, I do not recall that I ever gave any advice about implicit water.
To the best of my knowledge, I have never used it. The only comment I
can recall giving about water concerned not using -DFLEXIBLE in MD runs.
>Can you help me about my problem? It is possible for you? anywhey very very
>thanks!
>
>My problem:
Your problem is an example of why all gromacs questions should be sent to
the user's list rather than sending them privately. I absolutely do not have
any clue why grompp does not pick up the gbsa.itp file you mention below,
but I am sure somebody else might.
>For my system I defined an atomtype in this way:
>(I defined about 10 atoms type and for all I have got the same problem)
>
>[ atomtypes ]
>; name bond_type mass charge ptype sigma(nm) epsilon(kj/mol)
>NLAPT NC 14.0067 0.314 A 0.29760 0.87672
>
>
>if in the md.mdp file I set
>; IMPLICIT SOLVENT ALGORITHM
>implicit_solvent = no
>
>grompp tool give a good result, and mdrun can generate the good trajectories,
>but if I use the implicit solvent : implicit_solvent = GBSA
>
>the tool grompp give the error:
>
>GB parameter(s) missing or negative for atom type 'NLAPT'
>
>Fatal error:
>Can't do GB electrostatics; the implicit_genborn_params section of the
>forcefield is missing parameters for 8 atomtypes or they might be negative.
>For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
>website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
>
>
>so I put the following parameter in the gbsa.itp file the parameter:
>
>[ implicit_genborn_params ]
>
>; atype sar st pi gbr hct
>NLAPT 0.155 1 1.028 0.1488 0.79 ; N
>
>
>but grompp give the error
>
>Couldn't find topology match for atomtype NLAPT
>Aborted
>
>
>Can you give me an idea in order to solve this problem?
>Thank you very much!!!
My idea is that you should keep all gromacs related correspondence on
the gromacs users' e-mail list where somebody who actually knows
something might see it.
Sincerely,
--
Bruce D. Ray, Ph.D.
Associate Scientist
IUPUI
Physics Dept.
402 N. Blackford St.
Indianapolis, IN 46202-3273
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20110126/f5e13363/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list