[gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore
Szilárd Páll
szilard.pall at cbr.su.se
Wed Jul 6 03:33:22 CEST 2011
Additionally, if you care about a few percent extra performance, you
should use gcc 4.5 or 4.6 for compiling Gromacs as well as FFTW
(unless you have a bleeding-edge OS which was built with any of these
latest gcc versions). While you might not see a lot of improvement in
mdrun performance (wrt gcc >v4.5), as far as I remember, FFTW gets
slightly more boost form the new gcc versions.
I can't comment on other compilers, I haven't tried to run binaries
compiled with Intel Compiler on AMD lately.
--
Szilárd
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au> wrote:
> On 6/07/2011 1:36 AM, Anthony Cruz Balberdi wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Mark. Another question, will be better if I compile FFTW
> than use the one included in my linux distro?
>
> Per the GROMACS installation instructions, you want the precision of FFTW to
> match the precision of GROMACS. You'll have to find out what precision of
> FFTW is available for your distro and then decide. Note that
> single-precision will often be labelled fftwf or fftws, and double-precision
> fftw or fftwd.
>
> Mark
>
> Anthony
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 6/07/2011 12:28 AM, Matthew Zwier wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry about that.
>>>
>>> The default options are nearly optimal, and the difference between a
>>> modern (4.4 or 4.5) series GCC and the Intel compilers are only a
>>> couple of percent. Just be sure to have FFTW available.
>>
>> ... if planning to use PME. Also, Intel MKL is only a percent or two
>> faster than FFTW3, last I tested, but much more fiddly to link.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Matthew Zwier<mczwier at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Anthony,
>>>>
>>>> The default options are nearly optimal, and the difference between a
>>>> modern (4.4 or 4.5) GCC
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Anthony Cruz Balberdi
>>>> <anthony.cruz5 at upr.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Users:
>>>>>
>>>>> We recently received our new computer. This computer have 4 multicore
>>>>> Opteron AMD cpus and I am planning to install GROMAS. Which options I
>>>>> will
>>>>> need to use in order to achieve the best possible performance?
>>>>> Which compiler GNU or Intel?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for all you help.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>>> Please search the archive at
>>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list