[gmx-users] All-atom topologies for lipid head groups
Thomas Piggot
t.piggot at soton.ac.uk
Thu Jun 9 14:55:56 CEST 2011
Hi,
A force file like this does exist
(http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp800687p) but be aware, like the
CHARMM27 force field it is based upon, you will need to use
surface-tension to keep these lipids in the correct phase.
Cheers
Tom
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
> Ioannis Beis wrote:
>> Dear Gromacs users,
>>
>> I am a new user and I am trying to study the physical properties of the
>> interactions between cytosolic proteins and lipids. I have created the
>> Berger-Gromos combination, as described by Mr. Justin Lemkul in his
>> KALP15 in DPPC tutorial, as well as Berger-OplsAA, as described by Mr.
>> Chris Neale in gromacs mailing list. All-atom topologies might turn out
>> to be crucial in my work, both in the results and the data analysis
>> (e.g. H-bonds).
>>
>> Even if the all-atom model of Opls-AA is used for the proteins, the
>> lipid head groups would still have a united-atom description and
>> therefore the interactions can't be treated in an all-atom level.
>>
>> I thought of creating a new topology for the lipid head groups under a
>> head.itp file, by using parameter values from Dundee server and/or
>> Opls-AA, even though I do not know yet exactly how and I feel very
>> unsure about the eventual incorporation into the Berger-OplsAA
>> combination. Then taking single lipids of pre-equilibrated membranes,
>> editing accordingly the coordinate file (i.e. replacement of polar head
>> atoms and use of new coordinates, names and residue names for them) and
>> subsequently building bilayers.
>>
>> I would really appreciate if someone could send suggestions. In
>> addition, if someone already has an all-atom description of lipid
>> head-groups compatible with a protein-membrane force field combination
>> with all-atom protein description, I would be grateful if he/she could
>> share.
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>
> It sounds to me like you're trying to create a Frankenstein force field. Why
> wouldn't a UA representation of the lipids work? For hydrogen bonding, all
> polar groups are represented with explicit H atoms. This is generally true of
> all UA force fields, for lipids and proteins alike.
>
> If you really want an AA representation of your molecules, you're probably
> better off just applying the CHARMM force field to the whole system. The latest
> version of Gromacs supports CHARMM, which includes a number of common lipids.
>
> -Justin
>
--
Dr Thomas Piggot
University of Southampton, UK.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list