[gmx-users] charge groups
Gavin Melaugh
gmelaugh01 at qub.ac.uk
Tue May 10 18:56:34 CEST 2011
Hi Justin
The two files processed.top and topol.top are the exact same. What is
worrying me is that when I look at the topol.tpr from gmxdump, my charge
groups do not seem to be specified the way I stated in the topology file.
Gavin
Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> Gavin Melaugh wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> Do atoms belonging to the same charge group have to be indexed
>> consecutively in the topology file or can you have the following.
>>
>> [atoms]
>> 1 CA 1 CGE CA 1 -0.1150 12.0110
>> 2 CB 1 CGE CB 1 0.0000 12.0110
>> 3 CA 1 CGE CA 2 -0.1150 12.0110
>> 4 CB 1 CGE :wq
>> CB 2 0.0000 12.0110
>
> Assuming you fix this, then yes, splitting charge groups can work.
> Use grompp -pp to see the post-processed topology to make sure
> everything came out as expected.
>
> -Justin
>
>> 5 CA 1 CGE CA 3 -0.1150 12.0110
>> 6 CB 1 CGE CB 3 0.0000 12.0110
>> 7 HC 1 CGE HC 1 0.1150 1.0080
>> 8 CU 1 CGE CU 13 0.2650 13.0190
>> 9 NU 1 CGE NU 13 -0.5970 14.0070
>> 10 HC 1 CGE HC 2 0.1150 1.0080
>> 11 CU 1 CGE CU 14 0.2650 13.0190
>> 12 NU 1 CGE NU 14 -0.5970 14.0070
>> 13 HC 1 CGE HC 3 0.1150 1.0080
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Gavin
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list